2011
DOI: 10.1186/1753-6561-5-s7-p58
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of SSR-Tools for clone certification in Uruguayan Eucalyptus grandis and Eucalyptus dunniibreeding programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A probability value of complete identity of 3·96 × 10 −6 guarantees that the individual identity of each cassava hybrid, which is the probability of two genotypes being the same by chance, is 1 in 252 000. Thus, even though the probability reported in the present study is lower than the value observed by Torres-Dini et al (2011) while evaluating Eucalyptus clones using microsatellite markers for certification, in which the PI for all loci was 5·43 × 10 −9 and the probability of two individuals being the same by chance was 1 in 184 000 000, a high resolution power was observed in the present study and the paternity of the cassava hybrids were determined effectively.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…A probability value of complete identity of 3·96 × 10 −6 guarantees that the individual identity of each cassava hybrid, which is the probability of two genotypes being the same by chance, is 1 in 252 000. Thus, even though the probability reported in the present study is lower than the value observed by Torres-Dini et al (2011) while evaluating Eucalyptus clones using microsatellite markers for certification, in which the PI for all loci was 5·43 × 10 −9 and the probability of two individuals being the same by chance was 1 in 184 000 000, a high resolution power was observed in the present study and the paternity of the cassava hybrids were determined effectively.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…The importance of this analysis should be highlighted as its use can avoid the mislabelling of parentage, and which consequently compromises the certification of breeding programmes that guarantee the identity of a germplasm via genotyping (Torres-Dini et al, 2011;De Vieira et al, 2013;Shanmugapriya and Yasodha, 2014). Incorporating traditional breeding strategies with genotyping increases the level of knowledge about improvement populations, enabling a better selection of clones and preventing common errors, thus improving the effectiveness of decision-making for breeders.…”
Section: Snp Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%