2019
DOI: 10.1097/psn.0000000000000262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of the Meek Micrografting Technique for Coverage of Extensive Burns: A Case Report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another benefit is the easy application compared to the difficult handling of higher expanded mesh grafts (1:6 or 1:9) [42][43][44][45][46]. In shortage of donor sites, Meek enabled the expansion of smaller grafts, as well the usage of donor sites, which cannot be grabbed by other grafting techniques [46,47]. Furthermore, the re-epithelialization time seems to be shorter with the Meek technique compared to mesh grafts [43].…”
Section: Meek Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another benefit is the easy application compared to the difficult handling of higher expanded mesh grafts (1:6 or 1:9) [42][43][44][45][46]. In shortage of donor sites, Meek enabled the expansion of smaller grafts, as well the usage of donor sites, which cannot be grabbed by other grafting techniques [46,47]. Furthermore, the re-epithelialization time seems to be shorter with the Meek technique compared to mesh grafts [43].…”
Section: Meek Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%