2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.rvi.0000190928.19701.dd
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of the Peripheral Cutting Balloon to Treat Hemodialysis-related Stenoses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
79
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
79
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the cut surfaces, overdilation results in an increased risk of perforation. Therefore, the ratio of cutting balloon to reference vessel should not be greater than 1.1 to 1 [11]. However, compared to conventional PTA, cutting balloons require a greater introducer diameter and are comparatively expensive.…”
Section: Stenosis Of the Vascular Access Veinmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the cut surfaces, overdilation results in an increased risk of perforation. Therefore, the ratio of cutting balloon to reference vessel should not be greater than 1.1 to 1 [11]. However, compared to conventional PTA, cutting balloons require a greater introducer diameter and are comparatively expensive.…”
Section: Stenosis Of the Vascular Access Veinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of angiographic techniques are available for this purpose. Elastic or rigid stenoses can be treated by conventional PTA and stent implantation as well as by cutting balloon, for example [10,11]. To prevent recurrent stenoses, the use of drug-coated balloons is increasingly being reported [12,13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of cutting balloons for treatment of high-pressure balloon-resistant stenotic lesions in AVGs and AVFs has been described in clinical reports and small studies (50)(51)(52)(53)(54). A multicenter randomized clinical trial of 340 patients with venous outflow stenoses reported equivalent 6-month patency rates between PTA alone and cutting balloon angioplasty, but the cutting balloon approach experienced a greater number of device-related complications, including venous rupture and dissections (55). Another randomized clinical trial is currently recruiting to assess the primary 1-year patency rate after treatment of vascular access stenotic lesions with cutting balloon angioplasty or PTA (Cutting Balloon Versus NonCutting Balloon for the Treatment of Venous Stenosis in the Fistulas of Hemodialyzed Patients; NCT01321866).…”
Section: Endovascular Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both studies were randomized with comparable sample size, used the same technique for angioplasty and patency definitions, and conducted analysis on an intention-to-treat basis (1,2,10); however, one point regarding the protocols of the two studies helps to explain the patency discrepancy to some degree. In clinical trial by Vesely and Siegel (10), no routine follow-up diagnostic studies were performed. In other words, subsequent PTA was done only on the basis of clinical indications.…”
Section: Stent Graft For Stenosis At Vgamentioning
confidence: 99%