2019
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of troponins in clinical practice: Evidence against the use of troponins in clinical practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the introduction of high-sensitive cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays, troponin testing has been used in a broad spectrum of patients to detect minor myocardial injury[ 1 , 2 ]. A variety of non-cardiac clinical conditions is accompanied by “troponinemia”[ 2 , 3 ] and many reports have investigated the association between serum hs-cTn concentrations and adverse outcomes in almost every clinical setting[ 4 - 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the introduction of high-sensitive cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays, troponin testing has been used in a broad spectrum of patients to detect minor myocardial injury[ 1 , 2 ]. A variety of non-cardiac clinical conditions is accompanied by “troponinemia”[ 2 , 3 ] and many reports have investigated the association between serum hs-cTn concentrations and adverse outcomes in almost every clinical setting[ 4 - 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A point-counterpoint set of editorials in this issue of Heart debates the role of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) measurements in clinical practice 10 11. Collinson et al 10 discuss their concerns with the troponin measurements in the CHARIOT (Current Threshold for Diagnosis of ‘Abnormality’, Including Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction, Using Raised Highly Sensitive Troponin Appropriate for a Hospital Population) study 12.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They emphasise that: ‘It is important to remember that hs-cTn assays are extremely sensitive for myocardial injury, and that myocardial injury does not always (in fact most often), does not equate acute myocardial infarction (MI). The diagnosis of MI remains clinical but the diagnostic process should be circular rather than linear, as illustrated in figure 4.’ Mariathas and Curzen11 agree that troponin tests can be used to rule-out MI but caution that the manufacturer listed 99th centile level is ‘not the ‘true’ 99th centile for all comers at a hospital, despite the fact that in the vast majority there was no clinical suspicion of MI or myocardial injury.’ That conclude that given the results of the CHARIOT study, ‘we call into question whether using troponin assays outside this clinical context is of real clinical value in most cases, particularly outside the context of a history of cardiac chest pain?’…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%