2003
DOI: 10.7863/jum.2003.22.8.773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usefulness of a Prevoiding Transabdominal Sonographic Bladder Scan for Uroflowmetry in Patients Involved in Clinical Studies of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Abstract: Bladder scanning before uroflowmetry is a useful test for reducing the amount of nonevaluable flow rate data. If a voided volume of greater than 125 mL (>150 mL) is required, the mandatory prevoiding bladder scan volume should be greater than 200 mL (>250 mL), which would decrease the number of noneligible flow rate recordings from 23.9% to 4.5% (31.3% to 4.5%).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…10 Our findings are basically in accordance with those of Alivizatos et al, 10 but those authors have also stated that the measurement of PVR in a patient should be performed at the first desire to void. On the other hand, the least mandatory prevoiding bladder volume for useful uroflowmetry was determined to be 200 mL 16 ; however, in our study, the mean V 1 calculated before the first sensation to void was 117.7 mL. Thus, contrary to Alivizatos et al, 10 we think that PVR values calculated after the first sensation to void will not be enough and may also cause unreliable results.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10 Our findings are basically in accordance with those of Alivizatos et al, 10 but those authors have also stated that the measurement of PVR in a patient should be performed at the first desire to void. On the other hand, the least mandatory prevoiding bladder volume for useful uroflowmetry was determined to be 200 mL 16 ; however, in our study, the mean V 1 calculated before the first sensation to void was 117.7 mL. Thus, contrary to Alivizatos et al, 10 we think that PVR values calculated after the first sensation to void will not be enough and may also cause unreliable results.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…Hence, the optimum timing to measure PVR seems to be at the moderate feeling of micturition; however, this feeling may be highly variable as well. In a previous study, Dicuio et al 16 proposed prevoiding bladder ultrasonography for determination of at least a 200-mL bladder volume for a useful uroflowmetry test. We likewise propose the measurement of premicturitional bladder volume by ultrasonography and for performing PVR measurements if Values are mean ± SD the V 1 is greater than 540 mL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dicuio et al have published the formula: volume in ml ¼ height  depth  transverse  0:5, to more accurately determine bladder volume using US measurements ( Figure 11). 18,[23][24][25] Urinary retention is present if postvoid bladder volume is greater than 150 ml. 23,24 Alternatives to bladder PoCUS are commercial bladder scanners.…”
Section: Bladder Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,[23][24][25] Urinary retention is present if postvoid bladder volume is greater than 150 ml. 23,24 Alternatives to bladder PoCUS are commercial bladder scanners. However, these machines may not be readily available and more concerning, without direct bladder visualization, may leave operators wondering if they are measuring the correct structure in the pelvis.…”
Section: Bladder Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%