User Acceptance of Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Mixed Method Study

Abstract

BackgroundWearable activity trackers are newly emerging technologies with the anticipation for successfully supporting aging-in-place. Consumer-grade wearable activity trackers are increasingly ubiquitous in the market, but the attitudes toward, as well as acceptance and voluntary use of, these trackers in older population are poorly understood.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to assess acceptance and usage of wearable activity trackers in Canadian community-dwelling older adults, using the potentially influential factors as identified in literature and technology acceptance model.MethodsA mixed methods design was used. A total of 20 older adults aged 55 years and older were recruited from Southwestern Ontario. Participants used 2 different wearable activity trackers (Xiaomi Mi Band and Microsoft Band) separately for each segment in the crossover design study for 21 days (ie, 42 days total). A questionnaire was developed to capture acceptance and experience at the end of each segment, representing 2 different devices. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 4 participants, and a content analysis was performed.ResultsParticipants ranged in age from 55 years to 84 years (mean age: 64 years). The Mi Band gained higher levels of acceptance (16/20, 80%) compared with the Microsoft Band (10/20, 50%). The equipment characteristics dimension scored significantly higher for the Mi Band (P<.05). The amount a participant was willing to pay for the device was highly associated with technology acceptance (P<.05). Multivariate logistic regression with 3 covariates resulted in an area under the curve of 0.79. Content analysis resulted in the formation of the following main themes: (1) smartphones as facilitators of wearable activity trackers; (2) privacy is less of a concern for wearable activity trackers, (3) value proposition: self-awareness and motivation; (4) subjective norm, social support, and sense of independence; and (5) equipment characteristics matter: display, battery, comfort, and aesthetics.ConclusionsOlder adults were mostly accepting of wearable activity trackers, and they had a clear understanding of its value for their lives. Wearable activity trackers were uniquely considered more personal than other types of technologies, thereby the equipment characteristics including comfort, aesthetics, and price had a significant impact on the acceptance. Results indicated that privacy was less of concern for older adults, but it may have stemmed from a lack of understanding of the privacy risks and implications. These findings add to emerging research that investigates acceptance and factors that may influence acceptance of wearable activity trackers among older adults.

Physiolytics at the workplace: Affordances and constraints of wearables use from an employee's perspective

“…Physiolytics also offers the potential to improve awareness and cognition about health issues at work (Li et al, 2016). As discussed before, solutions exist that support workers in discovering and counteracting excessive sedentary behaviour or lack of physical activity at the workplace (Greenfield et al, 2016;Puri et al, 2017;Wiegard & Breitner, 2017). They may afford employees a new, unprecedented way of changing unhealthy work practices by actively supporting them with personalized instructions for health improvement (Yassaee & Mettler, 2017).…”

Willingness to adopt wearable devices with behavioral and economic incentives by health insurance wellness programs: results of a US cross-sectional survey with multiple consumer health vignettes

“…Previous studies have explained that health insurance companies could adjust their product strategies to motivate individuals to use wearable devices (2,3,15,4,(7)(8)(9)(11)(12)(13)(14) and even evaluated if consumers were interested to use a wearable device and share the data with their health or life insurance company in return for financial rewards for healthy behaviors (16,17). Other studies have examined the adoption of wearable devices as a whole (25) or by certain groups such as the elderly (26,27), runners (11) or health professionals (28); and found out that individuals follow a risk-benefit analysis too decide to adopt healthcare wearable devices (29).…”

Exploring the Systematic Attributes Influencing Gerontechnology Adoption for Elderly Users Using a Meta-Analysis

“…During the technology development, there are significant differences in the definition and understanding of elderly care needs by users and technicians, which has seriously affected the development and promotion of assistive technology [7]. Prior studies have attended the attitude, intention and satisfaction of the elderly to adopt gerontechnology to explain the influencing systematic attributes of the user acceptance of a certain technology [8][9][10]. However, the conclusions obtained by many studies have some differences, or even completely opposite.…”