2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2010.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User experiences, preferences and choices relating to functional electrical stimulation and ankle foot orthoses for foot-drop after stroke

Abstract: The consensus in this sample demonstrated positive and negative experiences of both FES and AFO use. Participants weighed up the pros and cons, and despite predominant preferences for FES, many also used AFOs due to some drawbacks of FES. Further research and development are required to reduce drawbacks and further explore users' experiences.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
27
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies, 13,72,76 utilising different research techniques and with varying patient populations, found that orthoses that did not fit properly, which were considered uncomfortable, heavy, cumbersome and unsightly, and which drew attention to disability, were less acceptable to patients, results which match findings from our own study. Phillips et al 13 combined nominal group technique and interviews in her study of people with CMT disease to identify perceived barriers and benefits to the use of AFOs.…”
Section: Findings In the Context Of Other Studiessupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These studies, 13,72,76 utilising different research techniques and with varying patient populations, found that orthoses that did not fit properly, which were considered uncomfortable, heavy, cumbersome and unsightly, and which drew attention to disability, were less acceptable to patients, results which match findings from our own study. Phillips et al 13 combined nominal group technique and interviews in her study of people with CMT disease to identify perceived barriers and benefits to the use of AFOs.…”
Section: Findings In the Context Of Other Studiessupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Three studies 13,72,76 have considered the views of patients towards the use of AFOs. These studies, 13,72,76 utilising different research techniques and with varying patient populations, found that orthoses that did not fit properly, which were considered uncomfortable, heavy, cumbersome and unsightly, and which drew attention to disability, were less acceptable to patients, results which match findings from our own study.…”
Section: Findings In the Context Of Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bulley et al [15] from a qualitative study based on focus group interviews, reported reasons for dissatisfaction as: 'uncomfortable, remarks of the participants to check the internal validity [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It starts from the moment a problem is reported, defines the design phase and concludes with the evaluation of the medical device and its use that has been supplied. Therefore, the key question is: Why there still remain -despite the use of ICF and PDMD -a substantial level of non-use of devices and a significant level of dissatisfaction among AFO users [6,14,15,17,[29][30][31]? In our opinion, the answer has to be found in the general character of the ICF and the PMDM that they neither facilitate a systematic and detailed analysis of the activities of users nor support a systematic mapping of the environments in which users are living.…”
Section: Identifying Needs Of Customersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wessel et al [16] showed that satisfaction is positively influenced by the design of the AFO, or in other words, the look and feel of the product and its aesthetics. The functionality of the AFO, the received care, and the involvement of the AFO user in the design process also influence satisfaction positively [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%