2002
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45868-9_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User Interfaces for On-Line Diagram Recognition

Abstract: The user interface is critical to the success of a diagram recognition system. It is difficult to define precise goals for a user interface, and even more difficult to quantify performance of a user interface. In this paper, we discuss some of the many research questions related to user interfaces in diagram recognition systems. We relate experiences we have gathered during the construction of two on-line diagram recognition systems, one for UML (Unified Modeling Language) notation and the other for mathematic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SketchVis uses eager recognition [1]. This means that a data attribute could be recognized from a single letter if no other data attributes start with that letter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SketchVis uses eager recognition [1]. This means that a data attribute could be recognized from a single letter if no other data attributes start with that letter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing literature [34,63,72] uses feature vectors to recognize individual symbols and syntactic approaches to validate the structure of the formula. Symbol recognition procedures are also used as a tool for man-machine interfaces [66,81,75,82,83]. This is not only an specific application domain but it also requires specific techniques because the recognition is performed on-line.…”
Section: Other Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…optimizing recognition model parameters) -all come into play when recognizing mathematics. The math domain 2 (a) Freehand Formula Entry System (b) XPRESS [116] (c) InftyEditor/InftyReader [141] (FFES) [20,136] (a) MathBrush [81] (b) E-chalk [144] (c) MathPad 2 [85] (d) Li, Zeleznik et al [89] offers sufficient complexity to challenge researchers, yet has characteristics that make the domain tractable: the semantics of math notation are fairly constrained, and a typical math expression consists of relatively few symbols.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%