User needs elicitation via analytic hierarchy process (AHP). A case study on a Computed Tomography (CT) scanner

Abstract

BackgroundThe rigorous elicitation of user needs is a crucial step for both medical device design and purchasing. However, user needs elicitation is often based on qualitative methods whose findings can be difficult to integrate into medical decision-making. This paper describes the application of AHP to elicit user needs for a new CT scanner for use in a public hospital.MethodsAHP was used to design a hierarchy of 12 needs for a new CT scanner, grouped into 4 homogenous categories, and to prepare a paper questionnaire to investigate the relative priorities of these. The questionnaire was completed by 5 senior clinicians working in a variety of clinical specialisations and departments in the same Italian public hospital.ResultsAlthough safety and performance were considered the most important issues, user needs changed according to clinical scenario. For elective surgery, the five most important needs were: spatial resolution, processing software, radiation dose, patient monitoring, and contrast medium. For emergency, the top five most important needs were: patient monitoring, radiation dose, contrast medium control, speed run, spatial resolution.ConclusionsAHP effectively supported user need elicitation, helping to develop an analytic and intelligible framework of decision-making. User needs varied according to working scenario (elective versus emergency medicine) more than clinical specialization. This method should be considered by practitioners involved in decisions about new medical technology, whether that be during device design or before deciding whether to allocate budgets for new medical devices according to clinical functions or according to hospital department.

Interactive management control via analytic hierarchy process: an empirical study in a public university hospital

“…The final version of this software has been now released as an App for iPad (Pecchia et al, 2013c) and can be freely downloaded via the web (http://www.ahpapp.net/).…”

Method for selecting expert groups and determining the importance of experts' judgments for the purpose of managerial decision-making tasks in health system 

“…The experts group approach is used in health sector both clinical [28], [31] and nonclinical [5], [24], [29], [30], [32] decision-making. The goal of this paper is to develop, test and analyse a methodology for determining the qualitative and quantitative composition of an expert group and its application on example of the health technology decision making in the Czech Republic.…”

A holistic approach to assess the feasability of telehealth for Parkinson's disease management

“…The first step to analyse the potential impact of novel health technology, is to quantitatively assess his potential impact and how well it is able to deal with the necessities of the final users. As it was stated by Pecchia et al (2014) [589]:…”

“…The complexities of medical device decision making require to collect and organise a spectrum of qualitative and quantitative information in a systematic way [589]. The first step to analyse the potential impact of novel health technology, is to quantitatively assess his potential impact and how well it is able to deal with the necessities of the final users.…”

“…Nevertheless, achieving this goal can be quite complex and challenging, identical requirements (e.g. safety, efficacy) can be evaluated differently for the same technology and technique, depending on the clinical problem, the medical and organizational skills and procedures of a practice team, on patient's attitudes and health status [589], [591]. Even within apparently homogeneous user groups, individuals may count with different backgrounds, different training and different working guidelines.…”