2021
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-353206/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using a dark logic model to explore adverse effects in audit and feedback: a qualitative study of gaming in colonoscopy.

Abstract: Background Audit and feedback (A&F) interventions improve patient care but may result in negative effects. To evaluate plausible harms and maximise benefits, a-priori theorisation using dark logic models can be useful. We aimed to assess the unintended adverse effects of A&F in colonoscopy using Feedback Intervention Theory (FIT) based dark logic model. Methods As part of the National Endoscopy Database Automated Performance Reports to Improve Quality Outcomes Trial we undertook a qualitative study e… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(17,18,45,46) This can be attributed to different factors, including the heterogeneity and complexity of provider behaviour change interventions and the poor reporting of interventions in primary studies (17,30) compounded by the limited use of theory in the design, implementation, evaluation and reporting of A&F interventions. (3,30,(47)(48)(49)(50)(51) Given that signi cant resources, including clinicians time are increasingly invested in NCAs, greater research effort needs to be devoted to understand and improve the consistency and magnitude of the NCAs' effects. (2,6,14,17,21,26,29) This research should identify underlying mechanisms through which feedback is effective and understand ingredients required to produce the most desirable effects of A&F as a QI tool.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(17,18,45,46) This can be attributed to different factors, including the heterogeneity and complexity of provider behaviour change interventions and the poor reporting of interventions in primary studies (17,30) compounded by the limited use of theory in the design, implementation, evaluation and reporting of A&F interventions. (3,30,(47)(48)(49)(50)(51) Given that signi cant resources, including clinicians time are increasingly invested in NCAs, greater research effort needs to be devoted to understand and improve the consistency and magnitude of the NCAs' effects. (2,6,14,17,21,26,29) This research should identify underlying mechanisms through which feedback is effective and understand ingredients required to produce the most desirable effects of A&F as a QI tool.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Catlow et al 3 in this edition of the journal investigated the unintended consequences of audit and feedback using an innovative approach. They undertook a theory-informed qualitative study of 19 endoscopists from six English National Health Service (NHS) endoscopy centres.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, watch out for the unintended consequences of A&F where there could be an impact on health professionals’ anxiety, morale, team dynamics, professional culture, and staff retention along with resource utilization and costs and to the wider patient community 7 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%