2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00799-016-0181-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using a file history graph to keep track of personal resources across devices and services

Abstract: Personal digital resources now tend to be stored, managed and shared using a variety of devices and online services. As a result, different versions of resources are often stored in different places, and it has become increasingly difficult for users to keep track of them. We introduce the concept of a file history graph that can be used to provide users with a global view of resource provenance and enable them to track specific versions across devices and services. We describe how this has been used to realis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A related and well-studied research area is personal information management [95]- [98], which refers to organizing and retrieving various kinds of personal collections. For example, Dumais [99] developed a system that provides a desktop personal search of information that a user has seen.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A related and well-studied research area is personal information management [95]- [98], which refers to organizing and retrieving various kinds of personal collections. For example, Dumais [99] developed a system that provides a desktop personal search of information that a user has seen.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can both negatively affect retrieval, as well as potentially lead to wasted effort in editing and reconciling prior versions (Bergman et al , 2015; Henderson, 2011). The version retrieval problem is often mentioned in the PIM literature (Bergman et al , 2014, 2015; Karlson et al , 2011; Jensen et al , 2010; Jones, 2007; Kearns et al , 2014; Rasel and Ali, 2016; Bergman and Whittaker, 2016; Henderson, 2011; Copic Pucihar et al , 2016; Geel and Norrie, 2016; Whitham and Cruickshank, 2017), but its effects on retrieval have never been directly measured.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%