2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using a motor imagery questionnaire to estimate the performance of a Brain–Computer Interface based on object oriented motor imagery

Abstract: Conclusion:The KI score can be used as a pre-test to predict the performance of a MI based BCI.The physical presence of the object of an action facilitates motor imagination in poor imagers. Significance:In BCI based on MI, in particular for assisted rehabilitation of the upper extremities.3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

5
83
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
5
83
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of these studies focus on inter-subject variability from a physiological [2][3][4][5][6], anatomical [7,8], or psychological [9,10] perspectives. Although precise distinction between user-related and system-related causes of performance variations may not be simple [11], these studies provide a better understanding of these causes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these studies focus on inter-subject variability from a physiological [2][3][4][5][6], anatomical [7,8], or psychological [9,10] perspectives. Although precise distinction between user-related and system-related causes of performance variations may not be simple [11], these studies provide a better understanding of these causes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a number of signal modalities that may be extracted from the EEG during either real or imagined movements, such as event related synchronization and desynchronization (ERD/ERS), event related potentials (ERP) and movement related cortical potentials (MRCP) [3]. Of these, we have shown the MRCP to be an ideal candidate for allowing very early detection prior to the task occurrence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…If there is only one type of movement [5], then MRCP is also likely to be present in the 'focus' phase. In the second paradigm, there are only two phases: focus and preparation/execution [3]. In this case, volunteers are typically asked to perform different types of movements, so a response to 'the focus' cue is a general preparation, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Related to the internal context, several studies have addressed performance variation in sensorimotor rhythm (SMR)-based BCIs [16]. These studies focus on inter-subject variability from an anatomical [17], [18], physiological [19]- [23], or psychological [24], [25] perspective or, in a lesser extent, on a combination of them [26]. In contrast, the intra-subject performance variation is less often investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%