2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2007.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using a wavelet network for reconstruction of fatigue crack depth profile from AC field measurement signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To address the problem of sizing cracks in a cluster a machine learning approach is proposed where the crack pocket length is predicted by an ANN which is trained to learn the inverse relationship between the ACFM signal and crack pocket length based on a training database obtained via modelling. An earlier study by Ravan, et al [57,58] proposed a neural network approach to reconstruct isolated cracks of multi-humped profile from ACFM measurements, although this network would not generalise to the characterisation of clustered cracks. In the present study, the inversion aims to map inputs from domain to through a non-linear network to predict the crack knowledge of the RCF cracks.…”
Section: Comparison With Single Crack Sizing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the problem of sizing cracks in a cluster a machine learning approach is proposed where the crack pocket length is predicted by an ANN which is trained to learn the inverse relationship between the ACFM signal and crack pocket length based on a training database obtained via modelling. An earlier study by Ravan, et al [57,58] proposed a neural network approach to reconstruct isolated cracks of multi-humped profile from ACFM measurements, although this network would not generalise to the characterisation of clustered cracks. In the present study, the inversion aims to map inputs from domain to through a non-linear network to predict the crack knowledge of the RCF cracks.…”
Section: Comparison With Single Crack Sizing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect produces strong peaks and troughs in B Z at the ends of defect, whereas B X shows peaks at the ends and trough at the deepest point of defect. The detecting coils of the ACFM probe generally pick up the signals of B X and B Z for defect recognition and quantification [12][13][14]. The lift-off value affects the interaction between the ACFM probe and the workpiece, and causes error in defect recognition and quantification.…”
Section: U-shaped Acfm Probementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the ACFM principle, the maximum distortion of B X above crack (M Xmax ), and the maximum distortion of B Z above crack (M Zmax ) [12][13][14] are selected as the characteristic vectors to determine the depth of the crack [9]. The simulation results show that the characteristic vectors decrease exponentially as lift-off value (H) increases.…”
Section: Lift-off Effect Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…X direction shows the direction of the scan path, so the detection coil of 1-D probe is arranged along Y direction. [4], the electromagnetic signal components of the magnetic field, the B X and B Z , are the important components for crack quantitative recognition. Through simulation and calculation, 100 rows of the magnetic field data near the crack in the surface of simulation model are picked, and the contour map of the magnetic flux density B Z near the crack is plot in Figure 2.…”
Section: Study On Acfm Angle Detection Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%