2017
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)hy.1943-7900.0001305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using an Improved Jet-Erosion Test to Study the Influence of Soil Parameters on the Erosion of a Silty Soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…New designs should be considered that make the instrument more user-friendly. Nguyen et al (2017) proposed a modified version of Hanson's (1990Hanson's ( , 1991 original JET in which the scour depth sensor can be rotated along an arc to measure the erosion profile rather just the scour at the center of the sample. This modification allows determination of the volume of soil eroded by the jet.…”
Section: Lessons Learned Laboratory and Field Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New designs should be considered that make the instrument more user-friendly. Nguyen et al (2017) proposed a modified version of Hanson's (1990Hanson's ( , 1991 original JET in which the scour depth sensor can be rotated along an arc to measure the erosion profile rather just the scour at the center of the sample. This modification allows determination of the volume of soil eroded by the jet.…”
Section: Lessons Learned Laboratory and Field Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagram and tables reported by Hanson et al () can provide guidance for defining the range of variability of these parameters. Moreover, some authors suggest empirical relationships between τ c and k d (e.g., Hanson & Simon, ; Nguyen et al, ); Wu () also reports an empirical formula for computing the erodibility coefficient (based on the clay content and the dry specific weight of the soil), which can help in the choice of reasonable values when specific erosion tests cannot be performed.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different test configurations and interpretations of results lead to different estimates for k d and τ c (Khanal et al, ), and even the use of a linear erosion law is still debated (Walder, ). Moreover, these parameters are observed to be quite sensitive not only to the type of material, in particular to soil texture and plasticity, but also to the compaction effort and water content (Fell et al, ; Nguyen et al, ; Wahl et al, ), with a variability up to 2–3 orders of magnitude (Hanson & Hunt, ). Therefore, the choice of erodibility parameters must be carefully considered, and the uncertainty in their values must be properly taken into account by means of a sensitivity analysis when data for calibration are not available.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, significant progress has been made to show the effect of grain size on erosion potential. However, fewer research studies have quantified the impact of other geotechnical propertieseven though they can also have a significant impact on the mechanisms that govern the erosion of coarsegrained soil particles (Sturm, 2001;Van Rijn, 2007;Nguyen et al, 2017). Thus, this study aims to determine the effect of other geotechnical properties on the erosion characteristics of coarse grains, as well as the effect of median particle size, which has previously relied on a simplified analysis that needs to be improved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%