2008
DOI: 10.1093/ee/37.4.850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Automated Flight Mills to Manipulate Fat Reserves in Douglas-fir Beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sample sizes are indicated by numbers beside means, ns indicates no significant difference in condition index between individuals that died or lived within a treatment, ** indicates the difference had P \ 0.01 unclear for natural populations where body condition varies among individuals, seasons and years. Indeed, our study population had less fat upon emergence than is often observed using similar methods of fat extraction (Elkin and Reid 2005;Williams and Robertson 2008). Most beetles in our study had less than 0.3 mg of fat, whereas beetles studied by Elkin and Reid (2005) had mean values close to 1 mg.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 44%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Sample sizes are indicated by numbers beside means, ns indicates no significant difference in condition index between individuals that died or lived within a treatment, ** indicates the difference had P \ 0.01 unclear for natural populations where body condition varies among individuals, seasons and years. Indeed, our study population had less fat upon emergence than is often observed using similar methods of fat extraction (Elkin and Reid 2005;Williams and Robertson 2008). Most beetles in our study had less than 0.3 mg of fat, whereas beetles studied by Elkin and Reid (2005) had mean values close to 1 mg.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…When we starved beetles of the same cohort as those we tested for 5 days, more than 50% died within 5 days while fewer than 10% died when this treatment was used in a previous study (Elkin and Reid 2005). The mortality we observed may be more pronounced than would be seen in other populations of newly emerged beetles, but may be commonly seen later in the dispersal process after energy has been expended (Williams and Robertson 2008). The exact component of body condition index that was responsible for the relationship between body condition and tolerance of high monoterpene concentrations is unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…could fly up to 8 h, while the southern pine beetle (Dendroctonus frontalis Zimm.) up to 6 h; and Williams and Robertson (2008) found that 6 h of flight for Douglas-fir beetles could be achieved but at the expense of a &50% decrease in body fat. J08 suggest that beetles undergoing passive transport in the midst of thermal updrafts should expend less energy than beetles on flight mills, while Williams and Robertson (2008) note that flight mill studies might overestimate flight times in nature due to the mill supporting the beetle's body while in flight.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…up to 6 h; and Williams and Robertson (2008) found that 6 h of flight for Douglas-fir beetles could be achieved but at the expense of a &50% decrease in body fat. J08 suggest that beetles undergoing passive transport in the midst of thermal updrafts should expend less energy than beetles on flight mills, while Williams and Robertson (2008) note that flight mill studies might overestimate flight times in nature due to the mill supporting the beetle's body while in flight. Given the range of measured flying times and the difficulty in assessing how laboratory studies simulate natural flying conditions, the methods developed in this paper appear to be both consistent with previous work and present a novel way of determining beetle flying times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%