Using behavioral interventions to reduce single-use produce bags

A meta-analytic cognitive framework of nudge and sludge

“…However, a recent study designed an intervention for each cognitive process to reduce single-use produce bags and tested the efficacy of the interventions with the same dependent measure. The study showed that participants in all intervention conditions used fewer produce bags than those in the control condition, but the efficacy in reducing produce bags varied across interventions and cognitive processes [ 43 ]. This study can be used as an example of how to design different interventions based on different cognitive processes in the same context.…”

Behavioral-alike model-driven residential charger power projection in serving private electric mobility in the new capital city of Indonesia

“…Meanwhile, from an economic view, it becomes more complex due to the lack of investment and the daunting task of attracting private investors to invest in the early stages of infrastructure development. Low utilization and the substantive upfront cost at the initial stage are the most common barriers (to join) as it may reduce the economic interest and turn the business model into a non-prospective investment, thus restricting the capital flow of the BEV business model itself, in which, ultimately resulting in a cycle of inefficiency [10]. Whereas behavior-driven factors affect both technical and economic aspects, yielding uncertainty and complexity, i.e., users, instruments, timeframes, and occurrences [9] [10].…”

Behavioral-alike model-driven for the power demand of battery swapping stations in supporting two and three-wheeled electrification in the new capital city of Indonesia

“…The adoption of e-mobility has been widely recognized as a viable approach to reducing carbon emissions, while still prevailing belief that the frontend scenario (the process of generating electric power energy until it is fed to the demand) is highly dependent on fossil fuels; however, the widespread acceptance of electric vehicles (EVs) utilized as backend scenario (the process to where electric power energy is used for other purposes) in decreasing carbon emissions is in enormous growing globally. One of the obvious in the upcoming days is the banning of new registrations while phasing out the existing fossil-based vehicles, i.e., Norway by 2025, Britain and Singapore by 2030, and the European Union (EU) by 2035 [1]- [3]. While paving the way for the transition in the energy sector and determining the ideal path of the future sustainable transportation system involves an inevitable effortlessness, and hence, providing supported infrastructures, deciding which should be prioritized and how to get financed 1267 (2023) 012076 IOP Publishing doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1267/1/012076 2 on its deployment, particularly in the initial stage of shifting is deliberate decision-making [3] [4].…”

“…One of the obvious in the upcoming days is the banning of new registrations while phasing out the existing fossil-based vehicles, i.e., Norway by 2025, Britain and Singapore by 2030, and the European Union (EU) by 2035 [1]- [3]. While paving the way for the transition in the energy sector and determining the ideal path of the future sustainable transportation system involves an inevitable effortlessness, and hence, providing supported infrastructures, deciding which should be prioritized and how to get financed 1267 (2023) 012076 IOP Publishing doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1267/1/012076 2 on its deployment, particularly in the initial stage of shifting is deliberate decision-making [3] [4]. A brief of how the escalated situation is pointed out by [5] [6] that the representative grid utility would require an investment between 1,700 to 5,800 USD for grid upgrading per unit of EV toward 2030.…”