2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11252-008-0071-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using best available science to protect critical areas in Washington state: challenges and barriers to planners

Abstract: Urban development has profound impacts on ecological patterns and processes making the scientific information required for developing environmental ordinances central for mitigating these negative ecological impacts. Washington State requires that planners use the best available science (BAS) to formulate land use ordinances as part of the state's Growth Management Act (GMA). We present empirical findings describing challenges to planners in defining "best available science" and using BAS to create local ordin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Natural areas with high conservation value or are critically endangered can be proactively identified and protected by zoning and related legal instruments (Mills et al 2009;Freeman and Bell 2011). Habitats with significant indigenous vegetation and wildlife should receive special protection (Breuste 2004).…”
Section: Protecting Nature-in-city Assetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural areas with high conservation value or are critically endangered can be proactively identified and protected by zoning and related legal instruments (Mills et al 2009;Freeman and Bell 2011). Habitats with significant indigenous vegetation and wildlife should receive special protection (Breuste 2004).…”
Section: Protecting Nature-in-city Assetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the abundance of literature devoted to understanding and defining policy directives such as the standard of best available science (Bisbal ; Meyer ; Mills et al . ; Ryder et al . ; Sullivan et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard of best available science , which seeks to accomplish the objective use of the best‐known scientific and biological information to inform policy and implementation decisions, is ambiguous (Bisbal ; Meyer ; Mills et al . ; Ryder et al . ; Sullivan et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A major contribution of this research to the literature on natural resource policy and administration as well as the standard of best available science is the empirical confirmation of institutional factors heavily informing the dataselection process. There is a tremendous ongoing discussion of best available science in the scholarly literature (Bisbal, 2002;Francis et al, 2005; M. W. Meyer, 1998;Mills et al, 2009;Ryder et al, 2010;Sullivan et al, 2006). However, this study sought an alternative explanation of the identification and selection of best available science.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%