2005
DOI: 10.1287/deca.1050.0040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Binomial Decision Trees to Solve Real-Option Valuation Problems

Abstract: informs ® doi 10.1287/deca.1050.0040 © 2005 INFORMS Traditional decision analysis methods can provide an intuitive approach to valuing projects with managerial flexibility or real options. The discrete-time approach to real-option valuation has typically been implemented in the finance literature using a binomial lattice framework. Instead, we use a binomial decision tree with risk-neutral probabilities to approximate the uncertainty associated with the changes in the value of a project over time. Both methods… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
81
0
22

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
81
0
22
Order By: Relevance
“…Such method bases on the assumption that there are two types of risk associated with most real investments: public or market risks, which can be hedged by trading securities and valued using option pricing theory, and private risks, which are project-specific risks and can be valued using decision analysis techniques. However, while the McCardle-Nau-Smith approach has a natural appeal in contexts where the distinction between markets risks and project specific risks is very natural (e.g., oil and gas exploration projects), there are several situations or industries where the distinction between market risks and project-specific risks is not as sharp (Brandão et al, 2005).…”
Section: Evaluating Real Options: Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such method bases on the assumption that there are two types of risk associated with most real investments: public or market risks, which can be hedged by trading securities and valued using option pricing theory, and private risks, which are project-specific risks and can be valued using decision analysis techniques. However, while the McCardle-Nau-Smith approach has a natural appeal in contexts where the distinction between markets risks and project specific risks is very natural (e.g., oil and gas exploration projects), there are several situations or industries where the distinction between market risks and project-specific risks is not as sharp (Brandão et al, 2005).…”
Section: Evaluating Real Options: Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decision analysis calculates the best decision path to take by maximizing the expected value of the outcomes. Decision trees and their variants have been used for real options valuation [45], [55], as an alternative to financial valuation models (see Section III). For example, binomial decision trees have been devised in [55] as a more intuitive alternative to the binomial lattice valuation method.…”
Section: Comparison To Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brandão et al (2005) concluem que os métodos tradicionais de análise de investimentos como o Fluxo de Caixa Descontado (FCD) são incapazes de captar a volatilidade existente nos projetos agroflorestais e é neste cenário que a Teoria das Opções Reais mostra-se com maior eficiência. Frey et al (2009) afirmam que a modelagem pelas opções reais tornou-se muito importante e utilizada na economia florestal na última década e tem sido utilizada para estimar rotações ideais de colheita e regimes de desbaste pelo fato da colheita da madeira ser uma decisão flexível, podendo aguardar condições futuras ideais.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified