2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2013.05.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using centroid time-delays to characterize source durations and identify earthquakes with unique characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
79
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
6
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For source depths of 17.5-25.5 km this analysis yielded shallow-dipping (13.7°-17.4°) thrust mechanisms with moments of 3.5-3.4 9 10 21 Nm, and could be completed within five to ten minutes if operated in real time, as it requires only 200-300 s of recorded signal after the origin time. Centroid time shifts, t c , of 42-41 s were found, which are only moderately longer than the value of 36 s predicted based on the average relationship found by Duputel et al (2013) of t c = 2.59 9 10 -6 M 0 1/3 (for M 0 in Nm). This provides a rapid determination that the source was not a tsunami earthquake, as such events have significantly larger t c shifts relative to the average (DUPUTEL et al 2013), even while the seismic moment, mechanism, and location of the 2015 event do suggest significant tsunamigenesis.…”
Section: Point-source Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For source depths of 17.5-25.5 km this analysis yielded shallow-dipping (13.7°-17.4°) thrust mechanisms with moments of 3.5-3.4 9 10 21 Nm, and could be completed within five to ten minutes if operated in real time, as it requires only 200-300 s of recorded signal after the origin time. Centroid time shifts, t c , of 42-41 s were found, which are only moderately longer than the value of 36 s predicted based on the average relationship found by Duputel et al (2013) of t c = 2.59 9 10 -6 M 0 1/3 (for M 0 in Nm). This provides a rapid determination that the source was not a tsunami earthquake, as such events have significantly larger t c shifts relative to the average (DUPUTEL et al 2013), even while the seismic moment, mechanism, and location of the 2015 event do suggest significant tsunamigenesis.…”
Section: Point-source Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Centroid time shifts, t c , of 42-41 s were found, which are only moderately longer than the value of 36 s predicted based on the average relationship found by Duputel et al (2013) of t c = 2.59 9 10 -6 M 0 1/3 (for M 0 in Nm). This provides a rapid determination that the source was not a tsunami earthquake, as such events have significantly larger t c shifts relative to the average (DUPUTEL et al 2013), even while the seismic moment, mechanism, and location of the 2015 event do suggest significant tsunamigenesis. An operational application of regional W-phase inversion was performed by the Chilean National Seismological Center of the University of Chile, and provided a solution within 5 min using data from 22 stations within 12°of the epicenter, with M W 8.1.…”
Section: Point-source Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…By averaging P d among many stations, distributed over azimuth and distance, the resulting function approximates the MRF. Assuming a triangular shape for the MRF, the plateau of P d versus time curves is reached at the peak of the MRF, and the corresponding time is a proxy for the source moment and duration 22 . Our observations indicate that the initial shape of the P d versus time curves typically follows an exponential trend.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…] = c which assumes that the corner frequency of the P wave, f cP , is the same as that of the S wave, f cS , but the observed ratio, f cP / f cS is commonly Duputel et al (2013). The right vertical axis gives the source dimension.…”
Section: Estimation Of Q P From P-and S-wave Pulse Widthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Allmann & Shearer 2009;Duputel et al 2013), it has also been a subject of debate, especially for small earthquakes (Abercrombie 1995;Ide et al 2004;Stork & Ito 2004;Oye et al 2005;Venkataraman et al 2006;Yamada et al 2007). Conventionally, the source duration of an event is determined from the spectral corner frequency by considering a frequency-dependent (Stork & Ito 2004;Oye et al 2005) or frequency-independent Q-model to remove path effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%