2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Choice Modeling to estimate the effects of environmental improvements on local development: When the purpose modifies the tool

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of valuation scenarios of the CE model include economic values of land use planning scenarios in Spain's semi-watershed [13], marginal willingness to stay of the recreational impact programs in Portugal [27], and MWTP for the community ecotourism programs [19]. These papers applied the estimation results and built up variety scenarios with the attributes successfully.…”
Section: Hypothetical Land-use Management Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Examples of valuation scenarios of the CE model include economic values of land use planning scenarios in Spain's semi-watershed [13], marginal willingness to stay of the recreational impact programs in Portugal [27], and MWTP for the community ecotourism programs [19]. These papers applied the estimation results and built up variety scenarios with the attributes successfully.…”
Section: Hypothetical Land-use Management Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of the final CE questionnaire started in October of 2015. Based on the above discussion, seven characteristics were included as CE attributes in the design: agricultural farming type [24,25], biodiversity [6,16,26], water provision [12], land use type [6,10,13,26,27], ecotourism mode [13], WTP, and WTW [6,13,26,28], as well as the levels of the attributes in relation to ecosystem services, as shown in Table 1. Agricultural production provides nutrition and health for human society [29].…”
Section: Choice Of Experiments Design For the Land Use Preferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the past CE research [1,6,8,11,14,[17][18][19][20][21]32,33], this study utilized a CE design to understand community-based ecotourism in the DFP area. We first built up the CE attributes and levels based on literature reviews covering the fields of community-based ecotourism and protected areas and also used onsite interviews with focus group discussions [13] such as those carried out with local government officers, community managers, economists, and the NGOs that have been working or studying in the area surrounding the DFP.…”
Section: The Attribute Design Of the Community-based Ecotourismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, this methodology had been widely applied in the recreation and ecotourism fields in the past two decades such as in the application of tourist preferences and MWTP for rock climbing [15], tourists' preferences for nature-based tourism in a national park [2], tourists' and local residents' preferences for ecotourism development in a protected area [14], the analysis of tourists' MWTP for cultural and experiential aspects in a heritage site [20], estimating preferences for a site and environmental functions in a national park [21], analyzing management strategy with regard to the attributes of ecology and recreation in a national park [6], estimating tourists' preferences under ecotourism planning surrounding a national park [1], estimating cyclists' preferences under the rubric of activity on bicycle routes [22], evaluating the cultural attributes of a cultural tourism and safari tour package [8,11], comparison of tourists' and locals' preferences for an environmental improvement program for local development [18], analyzing aboriginal people's cultural values for a case of freshwater in Māori culture [23], and estimating multiple attributes in an ecotourism site [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation