2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using computational modeling to assess the impact of clinical decision support on cancer screening improvement strategies within the community health centers

Abstract: Our conceptual model demonstrates our goal to investigate the impact of clinical decision support (CDS) utilization on cancer screening improvement strategies in the community health care (CHC) setting. We employed a dual modeling technique using both statistical and computational modeling to evaluate impact. Our statistical model used the Spearman’s Rho test to evaluate the strength of relationship between our proximal outcome measures (CDS utilization) against our distal outcome measure (provider self-report… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A secondary analysis was performed to determine the extent of impact of the clinical decision support (CDS) as an innovative best practice (with the use of clinical reminders, use of provider prompts at point-of-care, and generation of automated patient results for providers) on facility-level cancer-screening improvement scores. 27 Although our previous results indicate a positive correlation between HDCC participation and CDS use, traditional statistical analysis could not find any correlation between the use of CDS and its impact on cancer-screening improvement in CHCs. We were also unable to observe continued rates of improvement in cancer screening or sustained uptake of innovative technologies.…”
Section: Methods: Modeling Community Health Center Behavior With Ccontrasting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A secondary analysis was performed to determine the extent of impact of the clinical decision support (CDS) as an innovative best practice (with the use of clinical reminders, use of provider prompts at point-of-care, and generation of automated patient results for providers) on facility-level cancer-screening improvement scores. 27 Although our previous results indicate a positive correlation between HDCC participation and CDS use, traditional statistical analysis could not find any correlation between the use of CDS and its impact on cancer-screening improvement in CHCs. We were also unable to observe continued rates of improvement in cancer screening or sustained uptake of innovative technologies.…”
Section: Methods: Modeling Community Health Center Behavior With Ccontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…We were also unable to observe continued rates of improvement in cancer screening or sustained uptake of innovative technologies. 27 …”
Section: Methods: Modeling Community Health Center Behavior With Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, we examined the knowledge absorption rate of community health clinical staff with regard to breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening policies, guidelines, and protocols as derived from the use of electronic clinical decision-support (CDS) [31]. We examined the extent to which CDS use and corresponding knowledge absorption rates would be correlated to organizational performance for cancer screening [31]. We demonstrated that KAR was, in fact, a predictor of organizational performance in meeting process-of-care outcomes in cancer care [31].…”
Section: Smart Systems Vulnerability Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We examined the extent to which CDS use and corresponding knowledge absorption rates would be correlated to organizational performance for cancer screening [31]. We demonstrated that KAR was, in fact, a predictor of organizational performance in meeting process-of-care outcomes in cancer care [31]. Hence, we suggest that KAR can serve as an effective measure of HIT impact on performance by focusing on end-users' ability to access key knowledge by interacting with HIT tools and applying this knowledge to healthcare delivery and public health practice.…”
Section: Smart Systems Vulnerability Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Colorectal cancer screening performance rates are based on evidence-based guidelines. CDSS has been particularly effective in acquisition greater levels of health care evidence base practice (Carney et al, 2014). A big obstacle for CDSS is the difficulty in obtaining the patient and relatives information required for decision making (Wagholikar et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%