Using Conceptual Models to Facilitate Conceptual Change: The Case of Weight-Density Differentiation

Abstract

We report on two studies that assess to what extent sixth and seventh graders (a) did not differentiate between weight and density as quantities at the time of the preinterview and (b) made conceptual changes after participating in a curriculum on weight and density that uses computer-based conceptual models and simulations. In Study 1, 18 sixth graders received individual clinical interviews to assess their understanding of the density of materials and their ability to use a concept of density to understand flotation, immediately before and after they worked through an eight-lesson curriculum unit on those topics. In Study 2, 12 sixth graders and 10 seventh graders received individual clinical interviews before and after their classes worked through a more extensive 16-lesson curriculum on these topics and on the topic of changes in density with thermal expansion. In both studies, we found that the majority of students failed to differentiate consistently between weight and density at the time of the preinterview (although within this group, we distinguished between those who were beginning to have some insight that two distinct dimensions might be involved and those who were not), whereas the rest were able to make an initial qualitative distinction between these quantities. We found that our curriculum was moderately effective in helping some but not all children differentiate weight from density and -Requests for reprints should be sent to 222 SMITH, SNIR, GROSSLIGHT in helping other children consolidate their understanding of density. Further, the revised curriculum used in Study 2 seemed more effective than the curriculum used in Study 1. However, the curriculum was not equally effective for all groups of children (those children who had some initial insight that the two dimensions were necessary were helped the most). The experience of using the curriculum alerted us to the specific ways our models were helpful and certain complexities inherent in the process of using conceptual models to produce conceptual change. These complexities are discussed, along with ways to further revise the curriculum that might lead to its more widespread effectiveness with children.

Developing preservice elementary teachers' knowledge and practices through modeling‐centered scientific inquiry

“…TM ) within science investigations about solar motion 2 and electricity in order to help preservice teachers see, experience, and reflect on how some specific examples of technology can be incorporated into science teaching; (2) discussions about technology and modeling tools to provide a rationale and framework for technology integration; and (3) investigations of one of five modeling or simulation tools in science and incorporation of those tools in science lesson plans in order to help preservice teachers envision how they might use such tools in their own science teaching. Those tools included ThinkerTools TM (force-and-motion: White & Frederiksen, 1998) Smith, Snir, & Grosslight, 1992), and MARS TM (matter: Raghavan & Glaser, 1995). These tools and others are included on a Web site designed for preservice teachers' use within the course (link on http://schwarz.wiki.educ.msu.edu/).…”

Science and Core Knowledge

“…Work on this problem is most advanced within the context of the literature on science education (see, for example, Smith et al 1988, Wiser 1988a). But here we begin with the earliest case we know of in childhood development-the earliest conceptual change within the domain of number.…”

Development of Elementary 6th and 7th Grade Students’ Views about Scientific Model and Modeling throughout a Summer Science Camp

“…Sonraki yıllarda değişik yaş grubundaki öğrencilerin ağırlık-yoğunluk (Smith, Snir ve Grosslight, 1992), atom-molekül (Harrison ve Treagust, 1996), dirsek-hareket (Penner, Giles, Lehrer ve Schauble, 1997) ve maddenin halleri (Saari ve Viiri, 2003) gibi farklı içeriklerle ilgili bilimsel modeller yoluyla hem içeriği kavrama düzeylerinin araştırıldığı hem de modellerin tartışıldığı araştırmalar tasarlanmıştır.…”