2004
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.818884
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Conditional Copula to Estimate Value at Risk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the time-varying DCC t-copula improves traditional portfolio optimization models by accounting for nonlinearities in the dependence between portfolio's assets and dynamic changes of the dependence structure. Additionally, we are able to achieve VaR figures, based on the calibrated DCC t-copula by simulating N observations characterized by the DCC t-copula dependence structure (Palaro and Hotta, 2006). Following Berger (2013), we simulate 10,000 observations for each day and the LVaR is determined by the empirical quantile.…”
Section: • + Mn=mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the time-varying DCC t-copula improves traditional portfolio optimization models by accounting for nonlinearities in the dependence between portfolio's assets and dynamic changes of the dependence structure. Additionally, we are able to achieve VaR figures, based on the calibrated DCC t-copula by simulating N observations characterized by the DCC t-copula dependence structure (Palaro and Hotta, 2006). Following Berger (2013), we simulate 10,000 observations for each day and the LVaR is determined by the empirical quantile.…”
Section: • + Mn=mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We denote the log-returns of Nasdaq as variable 1 (X, say) and the log-returns of S&P 500 as variable 2 (Y). For details on this data set, see Palaro and Hotta (2006).…”
Section: Application In Risk Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to specify the bivariate model for these two returns, and to estimate the associated Var under several bivariate copula models, we will consider some specific Autoregressive integrated moving average-Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedastic (or in short, ARMA-GARCH) models, the reason being that return series are usually successfully modeled by ARMA-GARCH models by many authors. As suggested in Palaro and Hotta (2006), we will mainly consider three different ARMA-GARCH models: GARCH-N, GARCH-t, and GARCH-E. In terms of modeling the dependence between the two series, we consider three copula functions that are quite popular among other authors: FGM, Gumbel-Hougaard, Bivariate Gaussian copula along with our bivariate KW-FGM type copulas.…”
Section: Application In Risk Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared with traditional methods of Value at Risk (VaR) estimation, conditional copula theory can be a very powerful tool in estimating the VaR, as shown by [27] and [46]. However, modeling high-dimensional distributions is not an easy task and only a few models are potentially useful for constructing exible distribution models in high dimensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%