2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using convolutional neural network for predicting cyanobacteria concentrations in river water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(v) When images are available at a high temporal frequency, CNN's applicability to prediction tasks can be extended [58] e limitation of CNN has been underlined, due to the prerequisite of the high amount of data [46]. It may be a waste of time to interpret the data processing in a given large watershed area.…”
Section: Advantages Of Convolutional Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(v) When images are available at a high temporal frequency, CNN's applicability to prediction tasks can be extended [58] e limitation of CNN has been underlined, due to the prerequisite of the high amount of data [46]. It may be a waste of time to interpret the data processing in a given large watershed area.…”
Section: Advantages Of Convolutional Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A convolutional neural network (CNN) has been proposed to exploit the feature hierarchies of multi-dimensional data from low to high levels. (LeCun and Bengio, 1998;Pyo et al, 2020). Compared to a standard neural network, this method can more easily train the model by requiring fewer parameters and connections between elements (Krizhevsky et al, 2012).…”
Section: Convolutional Neural Network (Cnn)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shen et al (2019) estimated cyanobacteria blooms in river waters using a support vector machine. Additionally, Pyo et al (2020) simulated algal blooms in freshwater systems using a convolutional neural network (CNN). However, these studies focused on HABs in inland waters, which further access is necessary to undergo more dynamic and complex hydrological and ecological cycles in seawater.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies have reported a decline in model performance with increasing lead time Chattopadhyay et al (2020). reported a decrease in the model performance from 73 to 47% while predicting a cold-spell class as the lead time changed from 1 to 5 days Pyo et al (2020). observed the validation accuracy to decrease with increasing lead time when simulating Microcystis-a causative algal taxon of freshwater HAB.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%