2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.rsase.2022.100741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using deep learning to classify grassland management intensity in ground-level photographs for more automated production of satellite land use maps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison of Figures 4 and 5 also demonstrates that there is little practical difference between the scatter plots of STR-EVI and STR-MSAVI at low values of vegetation cover, probably because grass is present at all stages of the agricultural/cattle grazing cycle for the study areas. The study also corroborates results from Sentinel-1 and S-2 imagery which indicate that EVI is optimum for the classification of Irish grassland [65].…”
Section: Edge Curves and Vegetation Indexsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…A comparison of Figures 4 and 5 also demonstrates that there is little practical difference between the scatter plots of STR-EVI and STR-MSAVI at low values of vegetation cover, probably because grass is present at all stages of the agricultural/cattle grazing cycle for the study areas. The study also corroborates results from Sentinel-1 and S-2 imagery which indicate that EVI is optimum for the classification of Irish grassland [65].…”
Section: Edge Curves and Vegetation Indexsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The present study has some limitations regarding species classification, which may be improved by combining deep learning and spectral features to increase accuracy and efficiency (Saadeldin et al, 2022) such as the integration of vegetation height and canopy extraction and species classification. Further in‐depth research could also explore the effects of lower flight altitudes (e.g., 10–50 m) and adjusted flight attitudes (e.g., oblique photogrammetry) for more accurate monitoring of low‐growing herbaceous or recently emerged seedlings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study has some limitations regarding species classification, which may be improved by combining deep learning and spectral features to increase accuracy and efficiency (Saadeldin et al, 2022) Remote sensing provides basic variables for assessing and monitoring diversity, and establishing relationships between plant diversity and spectral data has been proposed as a potential solution (Chapungu et al, 2020;Gholizadeh et al, 2020). The NDVI is frequently used to assess vegetation health, greenness, and estimate vegetation species diversity.…”
Section: Feasibility Of Vegetation Species Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, another modification made to OPTRAM in this study is the use of the Enhanced Vegetation index (EVI) instead of the Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) as used originally in OPTRAM. EVI has several advantages over NDVI especially with respect to saturation issues over vegetated lands, where its sensitivity decreases with increasing biomass (Rocha and Shaver, 2009;Antunes Daldegan et al, 2020;Ojha et al, 2021) and based on class separability, it has also been shown to be an optimum VI for studying Irish grassland using S-2 data (Saadeldin et al, 2022). nSSM maps for the farm were obtained at a spatial resolution of 10 m (Figure 2).…”
Section: Optrammentioning
confidence: 99%