2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00163-007-0041-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using descriptions of biological phenomena for idea generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typically, these have contributed with large sample sizes and a rigorous scientific approach. However, many of these studies use only hypothetical problems, studying ideas from nonprofessional engineers or designers (Massetti 1996;Benami and Jin 2002;Nijstad et al 2002;Kristensson and Norlander 2003;Helquist et al 2007;Perttula and Sipila 2007;Mak and Shu 2008) with few exceptions (Kim et al 2005;Napier and Nilsson 2006) and thus show "little similarity [to] design concept generation in the real world" (Shah and Vargas-Hernandez 2003). Little empirical work has been conducted using professional designers working on actual design tasks within industry.…”
Section: Assessing Creative Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Typically, these have contributed with large sample sizes and a rigorous scientific approach. However, many of these studies use only hypothetical problems, studying ideas from nonprofessional engineers or designers (Massetti 1996;Benami and Jin 2002;Nijstad et al 2002;Kristensson and Norlander 2003;Helquist et al 2007;Perttula and Sipila 2007;Mak and Shu 2008) with few exceptions (Kim et al 2005;Napier and Nilsson 2006) and thus show "little similarity [to] design concept generation in the real world" (Shah and Vargas-Hernandez 2003). Little empirical work has been conducted using professional designers working on actual design tasks within industry.…”
Section: Assessing Creative Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, few have suggested mechanisms showing how these different stimuli are used to prompt new ideas. Mak and Shu (2008) have suggested that there are four categories of mechanism for idea generation using biological stimuli: literal implementation, biological transfer, analogy and anomaly. While these categories provide distinction between the types of mechanism, a framework for describing the differences is not shown.…”
Section: The Nature Of Creative Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the literature on biologically inspired design describes the technical details of cases of biologically inspired design (e.g., [19,37]). However, there also is small but growing body of literature on cognitive studies of biologically inspired design (e.g., [23,31,33]). Our work as described in this paper seeks to add to this growing understanding of the cognitive basis of biologically inspired design.…”
Section: Studying Biologically Insipired Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research found similar fixation when students were asked to map relevant strategies from biological descriptions to design solutions [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In our experience, many engineering students have difficulty identifying and applying possible analogies from biology, but instead fixate on irrelevant features in the descriptions of biological phenomena [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%