2019
DOI: 10.1155/2019/4639658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Dimensionless Numbers to Predict Centrifugal Jet-Spun Nanofiber Morphology

Abstract: In this study, we report a method for predictive, controlled, and highly aligned nanofiber production via Centrifugal Jet Spinning (CJS) using polycaprolactone (PCL) as a model polymer. We investigated the effects of fabrication conditions and their resulting dimensionless parameters, namely the Weber, Reynolds, and Capillary numbers, by correlating with fiber morphologies (fiber diameter, fiber alignment, bead frequency, bead aspect ratio, and scaffold porosity) and mechanical properties (linear modulus and u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(150 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The formation of nanofibers could be described by a group of dimensionless parameters, including Reynolds number (Re), Weber number (We), Capillary number (Ca) and Weissenberg number ( W i ) [43]. These dimensionless parameters only described the jet trajectory and fiber formation, but could not predict final diameter of the fibers [44]. As these dimensionless parameters only contained intrinsic solution properties, other key parameters (such as rotational speed, nozzle diameter and nozzle length) were excluded.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation of nanofibers could be described by a group of dimensionless parameters, including Reynolds number (Re), Weber number (We), Capillary number (Ca) and Weissenberg number ( W i ) [43]. These dimensionless parameters only described the jet trajectory and fiber formation, but could not predict final diameter of the fibers [44]. As these dimensionless parameters only contained intrinsic solution properties, other key parameters (such as rotational speed, nozzle diameter and nozzle length) were excluded.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While being able to reproduce many of the VIC-ECM connection features, the PEG gel used in this study is not a fibrous system and therefore cannot mimic the local AVIC micro environment exactly and thus disallows a collective preferred direction of the encapsulated AVIC population. However, this can be mediated in the future with the application of uniaxial constraints [42], incorporation of highly tunable polymeric fibers [43,44], or stretch [45] using our established tissue strip bioreactor system to direct cellular alignment [5]. An increase in cellular alignment should help the collective contraction of AVICs to be more pronounced, and thus measurable, on the macro level.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the third characteristic timescale, τ 3 , is determined by the diffusion coefficient (D), of the solvent through the drying polymer with jet radius, r [21][22][23][24][25]. According to several published studies, the fiber morphology depends on the polymer concentration, molecular weight, centrifugal speed, collector distance, and nozzle diameter [26][27][28][29]. Even though the centrifugal spinning technique has attracted a lot of interest, and the number of publications has increased tremendously due to its simplicity and its ability to produce fibers at a large scale, control over the fiber morphology remains the major limitation to upscaling [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%