2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using dispersion and mesoscale meteorological models to forecast pollen concentrations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As will be discussed later, significant progress has been made recently in laboratory measurements of ice nucleation rates of various IN. Combined with increasing model capability of simulating the emission and transport of atmospheric IN species (e.g., Lighthart, 1997;Uno et al, 2003;Chen et al, 2004;Kishcha et al, 2005;Pasken and Pietrowicz, 2005), the next generation meteorological models may be able to adequately examine the roles that major IN play in precipitation formation. Such work would be important to the understanding of interactions between land surface (including the ecosystem) and the atmospheric hydrologic cycle (Barth et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As will be discussed later, significant progress has been made recently in laboratory measurements of ice nucleation rates of various IN. Combined with increasing model capability of simulating the emission and transport of atmospheric IN species (e.g., Lighthart, 1997;Uno et al, 2003;Chen et al, 2004;Kishcha et al, 2005;Pasken and Pietrowicz, 2005), the next generation meteorological models may be able to adequately examine the roles that major IN play in precipitation formation. Such work would be important to the understanding of interactions between land surface (including the ecosystem) and the atmospheric hydrologic cycle (Barth et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial patterns of the pollen sources are based on vegetation distribution maps, which are subject to large uncertainties (Sofiev et al, , 2013Skjøth et al, 2010;Pauling et al, 2011). For pollen transport modeling, the pollen dispersion is either modeled by Lagrangian trajectory models such as PAPPUS (Tackenberg et al, 2003), SMOP-2D (Jarosz et al, 2004), CALPUFF (Pfender et al, 2006), and HYSPLIT (Pasken and Pietrowicz, 2005;Verinakaite et al, 2010), or by Gaussian advection-diffusion models such as ADMS (Hunt et al, 2001), DRAIS/MADEsoot (Helbig et al, 2004), Aquilon (Dupont et al, 2006), andMETRAS (Schuler andSchlünzen, 2006). Some key physical modules, such as dry deposition due to gravity, washout by precipitation, and resuspension by updrafts, can be parameterized explicitly into a model (Helbig et al, 2004;Kuparinen, 2006;Siljamo et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, these models can take into account the dynamical effect of topography, inhomogeneous canopy distribution, and obstacles that cannot be incorporated into the two models mentioned above. Recently, regional models were used to predict alder or oak pollen dispersal within a range of a few hundred kilometers; these models showed advantages in producing realistic pollen dispersion by using a realistic predicted wind field (Helbig et al, 2004;Pasken and Pietrowicz, 2005;Schueler and Schlünzen, 2006). Dupont et al (2006) predicted field-scale maize pollen dispersal by using a three-dimensional (3-D) atmospheric model and a diffusion transport model; field experimental data were reproduced as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%