2006
DOI: 10.1080/10407790500459338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Event Location in Finite-Difference Methods for Phase-Change Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Farrokhpanah [8] introduced a new smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method to model the heat transfer with phase change considering the latent heat released (absorbed) during solidification (melting). Furenes [9] used the event location algorithm in the finite difference method for phase-change problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Farrokhpanah [8] introduced a new smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method to model the heat transfer with phase change considering the latent heat released (absorbed) during solidification (melting). Furenes [9] used the event location algorithm in the finite difference method for phase-change problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…mass density (kg · m − 3 ) σ standard deviation σ p standard deviation in percentage of the average value τ current generation number the functional, genetic algorithms were used [22][23][24], whereas the Stefan problem was solved by generalized alternating phase truncation method [18,25,26] (for others methods see for example [27][28][29][30]). Let Γ 1,2 will designate the common boundary of domains D 1 and D 2 , whilst Γ 2,3 will mean the common boundary of domains D 2 and D 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%