2003
DOI: 10.1109/tevc.2003.819265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using evolutionary algorithms as instance selection for data reduction in KDD: an experimental study

Abstract: Evolutionary algorithms are adaptive methods based on natural evolution that may be used for search and optimization. As data reduction in knowledge discovery in databases (KDDs) can be viewed as a search problem, it could be solved using evolutionary algorithms (EAs). In this paper, we have carried out an empirical study of the performance of four representative EA models in which we have taken into account two different instance selection perspectives, the prototype selection and the training set selection f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
202
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 292 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
202
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the approach is promising, it is unclear when to stop the optimization for multi-class tasks (the authors terminated the evolution once 60 vectors from each category have been retrieved). Verbiest et al (2016) recently investigated the performance of different evolutionary techniques for selection of SVM training sets: (i) a standard genetic algorithm, (ii) the adaptive genetic algorithm, which dynamically updates the crossover threshold [only notably different parents can be crossed over (Eshelman 1991)], and (iii) the steady state genetic algorithm [two parents are selected to generate offspring (Cano et al 2003)]. Interestingly, the fitness involved not only the classification accuracy of the SVM classifier, but also the reduction ratio, indicating how much the input T has been shrunk.…”
Section: Evolutionary Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the approach is promising, it is unclear when to stop the optimization for multi-class tasks (the authors terminated the evolution once 60 vectors from each category have been retrieved). Verbiest et al (2016) recently investigated the performance of different evolutionary techniques for selection of SVM training sets: (i) a standard genetic algorithm, (ii) the adaptive genetic algorithm, which dynamically updates the crossover threshold [only notably different parents can be crossed over (Eshelman 1991)], and (iii) the steady state genetic algorithm [two parents are selected to generate offspring (Cano et al 2003)]. Interestingly, the fitness involved not only the classification accuracy of the SVM classifier, but also the reduction ratio, indicating how much the input T has been shrunk.…”
Section: Evolutionary Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another method related to the associates concept was the Iterative Case Filtering algorithm (ICF) proposed by [32]. In addition, evolutionary algorithms have been used for instance selection [54] [74] [37] [24] [138]. In [76] it was proposed a memetic algorithm, combining evolutionary algorithms and local search in the evolutive process, and [73] proposed the Clonal selection Algorithm (CSA), which is based on the artificial immune system approach.…”
Section: Wrapper Instance Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the high complexity of the optimization procedure involved, it is often preferred to use randomized (Pkalska et al 2006) or greedy methods (Battiti 1994;Wilson and Martinez 2000). Over the years, EL solutions have been proposed using nearest neighbors (Aha et al 1991), genetic algorithms (Cano et al 2003), vector quantization (Jankowski and Grochowski 2005) and density estimation based classification techniques (Fukunaga and Hayes 1989).…”
Section: Exemplar Learning On Embedded Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%