2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using feedback through digital technology to disrupt and change habitual behavior: A critical review of current literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
123
2
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
4
123
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, feedback about students' performance is known to improve their study results (Hattie & Timperley, 2007). A recent review concluded that the effectiveness of technology-mediated feedback interventions has not yet been sufficiently examined (Hermsen, Frost, Renes, & Kerkhof, 2016), but more traditional feedback interventions have been extensively evaluated. In a review, Kluger and Denisi (1996) found that the majority of feedback interventions were effective, although it should be noted that for about one third of the interventions the effect was adverse rather than beneficial.…”
Section: Self-monitoring and Feedback Interventions Versus Pimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, feedback about students' performance is known to improve their study results (Hattie & Timperley, 2007). A recent review concluded that the effectiveness of technology-mediated feedback interventions has not yet been sufficiently examined (Hermsen, Frost, Renes, & Kerkhof, 2016), but more traditional feedback interventions have been extensively evaluated. In a review, Kluger and Denisi (1996) found that the majority of feedback interventions were effective, although it should be noted that for about one third of the interventions the effect was adverse rather than beneficial.…”
Section: Self-monitoring and Feedback Interventions Versus Pimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[58][59][60] Attempts to improve adherence to ULT in individuals with gout have also been generally unsuccessful or marginally effective and difficult to sustain. There are particular additional impediments to improved adherence in patients with gout.…”
Section: Ethical Approvalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EPHPP tool has six sections, which are aggregated to a final grade on a three-point scale. Low study quality is a known issue in electronic interventions [75,76], but we did not exclude those studies. Rather, we checked if study quality moderates intervention efficacy, because a correspondence can be a sign of publication bias.…”
Section: Review Procedures and Moderatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%