1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf00006689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using frequency of dividing cells in estimating autotrophic picoplankton growth and productivity in the Chesapeake Bay

Abstract: In situ incubations of natural autotrophic picoplankton populations during a 15 month study were used to test the frequency of dividing cells procedure in estimating phototrophic picoplankton growth rates. These rates were estimated using dilution experiments and compared to the average frequency of dividing cells over the same time interval. The regression equation of p = 2.85 x 10 -3 (FDC) + 0.022 was calculated to relate autotrophic picoplankton growth rate and the frequency of dividing cells in this study.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). The temperature-driven annual pattern of Synechococcus abundance has been observed in temperate coastal waters (23,45) and estuarine waters (1,3,28). Warm temperature perhaps favors the rapid growth of Synechococcus in the Bay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). The temperature-driven annual pattern of Synechococcus abundance has been observed in temperate coastal waters (23,45) and estuarine waters (1,3,28). Warm temperature perhaps favors the rapid growth of Synechococcus in the Bay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Earlier studies reported that picophytoplankton (dominated by Synechococcus) could contribute 10 to 14% of Chesapeake Bay primary production during early summer (36). During late summer, Synechococcus can reach nearly 10 6 cells ml Ϫ1 and account for 56% of primary production in the southern part of the Bay (1). Picoplankton productivity often exceeds heterotrophic bacterial productivity during summer months in the Bay (21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The experiments ended in January 1997 when temperature was lowest at 11°C. Growth experiments were conducted in duplicate according to the procedure described by Agawin & Agusti (1997), modified from that of Affronti & Marshal1 (1994). For each growth experiment, a 6 l surface water sample was collected by grab sampling and half of it was filtered through Whatrnan GF/F filters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observations of dividing cells have been conducted for many organisms, such as heterotrophic microprotozoa (Sherr & Sherr 1983), autotrophic picoplankton (Affronti & Marshall 1994), and heterotrophic bacteria (Hagstrom et al 1979, Newell & Christian 1981, Fukuda et al 2006), but no application to AAP bacteria has been reported to date.…”
Section: Diel Variations Of Fdc Of Aap Bacteria Versus Total Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%