2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using genome wide association studies to identify common QTL regions in three different genetic backgrounds based on Iberian pig breed

Abstract: One of the major limitation for the application of QTL results in pig breeding and QTN identification has been the limited number of QTL effects validated in different animal material. The aim of the current work was to validate QTL regions through joint and specific genome wide association and haplotype analyses for growth, fatness and premier cut weights in three different genetic backgrounds, backcrosses based on Iberian pigs, which has a major role in the analysis due to its high productive relevance. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, most of the genetic variance is explained by minor loci that were not detected in the GWAS. Taken together, these results confirm that backfat thickness has a polygenic architecture, although some major genes that agree with previous studies [ 13 , 17 , 22 ] contribute large proportions of the genetic variance of the trait in some lines. In that regard, shifting towards an omnigenic model [ 33 ] may provide a more suitable conceptualisation of the genetic architecture of backfat thickness.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, most of the genetic variance is explained by minor loci that were not detected in the GWAS. Taken together, these results confirm that backfat thickness has a polygenic architecture, although some major genes that agree with previous studies [ 13 , 17 , 22 ] contribute large proportions of the genetic variance of the trait in some lines. In that regard, shifting towards an omnigenic model [ 33 ] may provide a more suitable conceptualisation of the genetic architecture of backfat thickness.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Of these, LRP5 and BRSK2 are in the 0.00–4.82 Mb genomic region on SSC2. Although we detected a significant association for this region in only one line, several GWAS on backfat thickness in pigs have revealed a significant association of this genomic region with backfat thickness, average daily gain, and meat-to-fat ratio in diverse genetic backgrounds, from F 2 populations derived from breeds such as Pietrain, Large White and Landrace [ 32 ] to crosses of Iberian pigs with Landrace, Pietrain, and Duroc [ 13 ], and many QTL reports support these findings. This region is gene-rich and includes many candidate genes, such as the INS gene, which encodes insulin that regulates blood glucose levels, promotes cell fat storage, and regulates the activity of enzymes that intervene in lipid metabolism [ 53 ], and the IGF2 gene, which encodes the insulin-like growth factor 2, and is widely considered as a major candidate gene for muscle mass and fat deposition in pigs [ 7 9 , 22 , 32 , 54 , 55 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pigs were raised in an intensive system and fed ad libitum with a cereal-based commercial diet until slaughtered at 187.4 ± 10.1 days of age on NOVA GENÈTICA S. A. experimental farm (Lleida, Spain). Detailed information of generation schemes, diet, growth, and housing conditions of the three backcrosses is described in Martínez-Montes et al 30 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fat deposition is also a critical biological process, generally measured by backfat thickness (BFT) or intermuscular fat content. Until now, Considerable association analysis has been focused on nding single-site variants, quantitative trait loci (QTLs), and related candidate functional genes that might in uence growth and fatness traits [20][21][22]. However, the systematic association studies for complex quantitative traits based on CNVs were rarely explored [18,23], and the full relevance of CNVs to the genetic basis involved is yet to be clari ed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%