1992
DOI: 10.1017/s0263593300007793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using granite to image the thermal state of the source terrane

Abstract: It should be possible to infer the thermal state of the source terrane for granitic bodies, provided we have independent means to establish the chemical nature of this terrane. The chemical nature of the granitic rocks, including their degree of hydration, implies the solidus temperature. The concentration of the heat-producing radioactive elements in the granite (K, U, and Th) probably provides an upper estimate of their concentration in the source rock, which is an important thermal parameter. The depth and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consider a source of area of 10 3 -10 4 km 2 beneath which an average of 1 km 3 per km 2 of melt is extracted from 10 km depth of suprasolidus continental crust (e.g. Zen 1992). For a pluton that is 1 km thick, the melting footprint, the region of melt throughput and the pluton area are identical.…”
Section: Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider a source of area of 10 3 -10 4 km 2 beneath which an average of 1 km 3 per km 2 of melt is extracted from 10 km depth of suprasolidus continental crust (e.g. Zen 1992). For a pluton that is 1 km thick, the melting footprint, the region of melt throughput and the pluton area are identical.…”
Section: Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking an arbitrary crustal section of 100 × 100 km with a thickness of 10 km, which can be regarded as a magmatic system during regional metamorphism, we are able to calculate melt volume in any part of the system under consideration. A total melting of a 1 km 3 per 1 km 2 crustal column seems a reasonable value for total melt volume (Zen 1992), which gives tot V = 10 4 km 3 . Now, considering the above relationships we can calculate that 1 m 3 may contain up to 900 leucosomes with volumes between 1 cm 3 and 1 dm 3 at m = 0.97.…”
Section: − =mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…As outlined here, the heat source is mantle upwelling, consequent on rifting. In this model, granite is the end product of mantle advection and/or basalt insertion via dykes high in the crust, and subduction or thrust loading are not responsible (see the modelling of the thermal state of the source of the Boulder Batholith, Zen 1992). Perhaps Read was partly right and there is a separation of plutonism and volcanism, particularly of the eRic-alkaline variety, in that many batholithic granites are not directly related to subduction while many volcanic rocks are!…”
Section: Where Are We Going?mentioning
confidence: 99%