Using Health Technology Assessment to Support Optimal Use of Technologies in Current Practice: The Challenge of “Disinvestment”

Abstract

<jats:p><jats:bold>Background:</jats:bold>Health systems face rising patient expectations and economic pressures; decision makers seek to enhance efficiency to improve access to appropriate care. There is international interest in the role of HTA to support decisions to optimize use of established technologies, particularly in “disinvesting” from low-benefit uses.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Methods:</jats:bold>This study summarizes main points from an HTAi Policy Forum meeting on this topic, drawing on presentations, discussions among attendees, and an advance background paper.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Results and Conclusions:</jats:bold>Optimization involves assessment or re-assessment of a technology, a decision on optimal use, and decision implementation. This may occur within a routine process to improve safety and quality and create “headroom” for new technologies, or ad hoc in response to financial constraints. The term “disinvestment” is not always helpful in describing these processes. HTA contributes to optimization, but there is scope to increase its role in many systems. Stakeholders may have strong views on access to technology, and stakeholder involvement is essential. Optimization faces challenges including loss aversion and entitlement, stakeholder inertia and entrenchment, heterogeneity in patient outcomes, and the need to demonstrate convincingly absence of benefit. While basic HTA principles remain applicable, methodological developments are needed better to support optimization. These include mechanisms for candidate technology identification and prioritization, enhanced collection and analysis of routine data, and clinician engagement. To maximize value to decision makers, HTA should consider implementation strategies and barriers. Improving optimization processes calls for a coordinated approach, and actions are identified for system leaders, HTA and other health organizations, and industry.</jats:p>

Using clinical practice variations as a method for commissioners and clinicians to identify and prioritise opportunities for disinvestment in health care: a cross-sectional study, systematic reviews and qualitative study

“…40,167,176 We found similar emphasis was placed on the importance of engagement among our informants, but went on to show the difficulties of clinical engagement in practice.…”

A systematic review on current status of health technology reassessment: insights for South Korea

“…Unlike evidence for new technology, providing clear evidence for the benefit or harm of established technology is more difficult. Therefore, assessments of technologies in regular use frequently depend on the analysis of routine health system data [16]. The United Kingdom’s NICE developed three strategies to support the HTR process, namely technology appraisal, recommendation reminders, and commissioning guidelines.…”

Htai Policy Forum: Keeping Hta on Track

“…The publications developed from Policy Forum discussions (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8) are well worth reading and freely accessible on the HTAi website. Looking back at this output since 2007 gives an indication that "technology management" has been, in some shape or form, an area of interest for most meetings.…”