2006
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-4102-0_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Hedges to Classify Citations in Scientific Articles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He finds that hedges are similarly distributed between abstracts and full-text and that they are most frequent in Results and Discussion sections of scientific articles. DiMarco and Mercer [5] study the intended communicative purpose (dispute, confirmation, use of materials, tools, etc.) of citations in scientific text and show that hedging is used more frequently in citation contexts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He finds that hedges are similarly distributed between abstracts and full-text and that they are most frequent in Results and Discussion sections of scientific articles. DiMarco and Mercer [5] study the intended communicative purpose (dispute, confirmation, use of materials, tools, etc.) of citations in scientific text and show that hedging is used more frequently in citation contexts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automatic hedge/uncertainty detection has generated active research in recent years within the NLP community. Early work in this area focused on detecting speculative language in scientific text (Mercer et al, 2004;Di Marco et al, 2006;Kilicoglu and Bergler, 2008). The open evaluation as part of the CoNLL shared task in 2010 to detect uncertainty and hedging in biomedical and Wikipedia text (Farkas et al, 2010) triggered further research on this problem in the general domain (Agarwal and Yu, 2010;Morante et al, 2010;Velldal et al, 2012;Choi et al, 2012).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial studies in this area were done in processing hedges, uncertainty and lack of commitment, specifically focused on scientific text (Mercer et al, 2004;Di Marco et al, 2006;Farkas et al, 2010). More recently, researchers have also looked into capturing author commitment in nonscientific text, e.g., levels of factuality in newswire (Saurí and Pustejovsky, 2009), types of commitment of beliefs in a variety of genres including conversational text (Diab et al, 2009;Prabhakaran et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While most groups either only address meta-information such as bibliographic data for citation analysis, or do text mining in abstracts or content (Ananiadou, 2007), the Searchbench is probably the first system that addresses both text analytics with a semantic index as well as citation analysis and search based on a common pre-processing and an integrated user interface on a non-trivial document collection. Garzone (1996), DiMarco, Kroon and Mercer (2006), and Teufel, Siddharthan and Tidhar (2006) address citation function analysis based on citation sentences and their context. The only approach, to our best knowledge, that applies deep linguistic parsing to generate a structured semantic search index as we do, is the Medie/ Info-Pubmed system (Ohta et al, 2010), but operating on Medline abstracts only, while we address the full content of research papers, including citations and references.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%