2022
DOI: 10.3390/rs14092083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using High-Frequency PAR Measurements to Assess the Quality of the SIF Derived from Continuous Field Observations

Abstract: Fluctuations in illumination are one of the major sources for SIF retrieval errors during temporal continuous field measurements. In this study, we propose a method for evaluating the quality of SIF based on simultaneous measurements of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), which are acquired using a quantum sensor at a sampling frequency higher than that obtained using spectral measurements. The proposed method is based on the coefficient of variation (known as relative standard deviation) of the high-fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PAR data can eliminate the effect of SIF due to light instability. This method can extract a more accurate and reliable SIF data set from long-term field observations for studying the relationship between SIF and vegetation photosynthesis [73]. SIF can better estimate yield after PAR normalization [74,75].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PAR data can eliminate the effect of SIF due to light instability. This method can extract a more accurate and reliable SIF data set from long-term field observations for studying the relationship between SIF and vegetation photosynthesis [73]. SIF can better estimate yield after PAR normalization [74,75].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under unstable weather conditions, rapid changes of the illumination occurred during the measurement, leading to notable differences between the real E when measuring L (EL) and the measured EM. It will result in a significant error in the calculation of canopy reflectance SIF derived from E and L, introducing uncertainty into the subsequent data analysis [38]. Therefore, before data processing, we filtered and removed abnormal data caused by abrupt changes in light intensity.…”
Section: E Data Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%