2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.89.045428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using high pressure to unravel the mechanism of visible emission in amorphous Si/SiOxnanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of much effort to investigate the optical properties of nanosized Si, the actual origin of its strong PL signal is still under debate [7][8][9][10]. While many experimental works point toward strong luminescence due to quantum-confined excitons in Si nanostructures fabricated with different methods [8,[11][12][13][14], others suggest that the PL emission arises from highly localized surface states [14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In spite of much effort to investigate the optical properties of nanosized Si, the actual origin of its strong PL signal is still under debate [7][8][9][10]. While many experimental works point toward strong luminescence due to quantum-confined excitons in Si nanostructures fabricated with different methods [8,[11][12][13][14], others suggest that the PL emission arises from highly localized surface states [14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These authors obtained pressure coefficients in close agreement with those of bulk Si (−14.1 meV/GPa) [19], concluding that the bright emission in their samples mainly arises from the indirect transition in Si. Recently, Goñi et al [10] have used high-pressure experiments to investigate the origin of the visible emission in amorphous Si/SiO x nanoparticles. Although these authors report PL pressure coefficients that are sizably lower than those of bulk Si, they still conclude that the strong PL signal in their samples is determined by QC, which is supported by the fact that their experimental pressure coefficients seem to be systematically related to nanoparticle sizes and emission energies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…65 Actually, the study of the photoluminescence of these structures at high hydrostatic pressures from both the theoretical and the experimental point of view is a sign of their quantum confinement. 65 Other two-dimensional nanostructures studied in the framework of their thermoelectric performance were Cr/V 2 O 5 thin films (with ZT of 0.16 at room temperature 66 ), Al:ZnO sputtered thin films (with a ZT over 0.1, three times bigger than previously reported values 67 ), silicon thin layers and graphene membranes, both from the theoretical 28,40,68 and experimental 43 point of view.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we can only speculate, arguing as in the case of the pressure dependence of optical transitions in amorphous Si nanoparticles embedded in a substoichiometric oxide matrix [62]. In this paper, it was shown by combining high-pressure PL experiments and ab-initio band structure calculations that the sign and magnitude of the pressure derivative of transition energies from different electron states are solely determined by the confinement energy.…”
Section: B Effect Of the Hydrostatic Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%