2019
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/04/026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Gaia DR2 to constrain local dark matter density and thin dark disk

Abstract: We use stellar kinematics from the latest Gaia data release (DR2) to measure the local dark matter (DM) density ρ DM in a heliocentric cylinder of radius R = 150 pc and half-height z = 200 pc. We also explore the prospect of using our analysis to estimate the DM density in local substructure by setting constraints on the surface density and scale height of a thin dark disk aligned with the baryonic disk and formed due to dissipative dark matter self-interactions. Performing the statistical analysis within a Ba… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
140
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
8
140
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under a fifth force model the Cepheid distances are altered tod i j , as we quantify below, so that the true galaxy distancesD i are an average over the distancesd i j implied by each of the individual Cepheids, weighted by the inverse square of their magnitude uncertainties ∆m i j (period uncertainties are subdominant and not quoted in R16). This ensures that galaxies with smaller 7 An alternative estimate of ρ local from Gaia suggests a slightly higher value of 1.6 × 10 7 M kpc −3 [125]. However, we also require the bulk of the observed Cepheids in the MW to be screened so that they calibrate the Newtonian PLR.…”
Section: Cepheid Distancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under a fifth force model the Cepheid distances are altered tod i j , as we quantify below, so that the true galaxy distancesD i are an average over the distancesd i j implied by each of the individual Cepheids, weighted by the inverse square of their magnitude uncertainties ∆m i j (period uncertainties are subdominant and not quoted in R16). This ensures that galaxies with smaller 7 An alternative estimate of ρ local from Gaia suggests a slightly higher value of 1.6 × 10 7 M kpc −3 [125]. However, we also require the bulk of the observed Cepheids in the MW to be screened so that they calibrate the Newtonian PLR.…”
Section: Cepheid Distancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These estimates are focused on a local volume that excludes the Galactic plane (for example, [16] analysed stars within a vertical distance of |z| = 515-1247 pc for their α-young population and |z| = 634-2266 pc for their α-old population). On the contrary, the three ρ DM, studies that used Gaia's information (references [17,18,19]) present larger uncertainties and some of their estimates do not agree that well with the three older studies. One important difference is that the new estimates are concentrated on the local |z| < 200 pc, including the Galactic plane.…”
Section: Differences In the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Those studies based on the rotation curve ( [13,14,12]), the distribution function fitting ( [8,10] are presented in pink, blue and gray, respectively. The colour is darker for the analyses [17,18,19,12] to show the use of Gaia's observations. It is easy to see a clear difference in the precision and agreement of earlier ρ DM, estimates and those performed after 2017, especially in the three estimates that included Gaia's observations and applied the vertical Jeans equation method.…”
Section: Recent Estimates Of ρ Dmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DM in the planet's rest frame defined as v d = v i + v e where | v e | ≈ 230 km s −1 is the Earth's velocity in the galactic rest frame [49,50]. We normalize N e in this Maxwell Boltzmann distribution to match a conservatively low background DM density of ρ χ = 0.3 GeV/cm 3 [51][52][53] and truncate the distribution at a conservatively low galactic escape velocity of v esc = 528 km s −1 [54]. For each simulated DM particle, an entry angle θ into the planet in question was randomly chosen, distributed according to the probability density function dP (θ) dθ = 2 sin(θ) cos(θ),…”
Section: Total Annihilationmentioning
confidence: 99%