2015
DOI: 10.2172/1372638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using learning curves on energy-efficient technologies to estimate future energy savings and emission reduction potentials in the U.S. iron and steel industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More than 70 energy-efficiency measures are currently applied at different scales (e.g., low penetration or mature) in the U.S. iron and steel industry. About 60% of these technologies are used at their maximum potential or close to maximum [63]. The model calibration includes all the energy-efficient technologies.…”
Section: Assumptions and Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More than 70 energy-efficiency measures are currently applied at different scales (e.g., low penetration or mature) in the U.S. iron and steel industry. About 60% of these technologies are used at their maximum potential or close to maximum [63]. The model calibration includes all the energy-efficient technologies.…”
Section: Assumptions and Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basic parameters and assumptions for the U.S. iron and steel production processes can be found in Karali et al [61,62] and for 14 energy-efficient technologies in Table A1 in Appendix A. Technology-specific learning rates and maximum penetration levels used in this study for existing energy-efficient technologies come from an earlier study by the authors, which calculates the learning rates of energy-efficient technologies used in the U.S. iron and steel sector [63]. For emerging technologies, we use the average learning rate from the same study for energy-efficient technologies that have penetration levels of 20% or below (i.e., learning rate of 10%).…”
Section: Selection Of Energy-efficient Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until to the today, learning curve models have been widely used in different industries. Hartley (1965), , Benkard (2000), Bongers (2017) in the aircraft industry; Levitt et al (2013) in the automobile industry; Boston Consulting Group (1973), Dick (1991), and Chung (2001) in the semiconductor industry; , Kim et al (2019) in the ship industry; Lieberman (1984), Sinclair et al (2000) in the chemical industry; Karali et al (2015) in the iron and steel industry; Chen and Lu (2012), Xu et al (2017), Hayashi et al (2018) in the wind power and other power technologies; Tan and Elias (2000) in the construction industry; Pramongkit et al (2002), Franceschini and Galetto (2003), Karaoz and Albeni (2005) Both the learning and experience curves indicate that more experience will be gained and production costs will decrease with the production of a good or service (Louwen and Lacerda, 2020).The learning or experience curve illustrates the decrease in average cost as the cumulative total output of the firm increases (Church and Ware, 2000;Salvatore, 2008).Wright's model is referred to as the log-linear model has been widely used to estimate the linear learning curve.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The learning rate-the percentage at which costs decline after each doubling of cumulative production-is the commonly used metric for defining the rate of change in product costs derived from learning curves. As 'learning' continues the cost is bound to fall, although the exponential nature of the curves means that reductions will slowly level-off over time (Karali et al 2015). More importantly, ongoing learning effects reduce costs and enable a technology to reach broader markets and extend its range of applications.…”
Section: Learning Ratementioning
confidence: 99%