2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.00031.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Logistic Regression to Analyze the Sensitivity of PVA Models: a Comparison of Methods Based on African Wild Dog Models

Abstract: We used logistic regression as a method of sensitivity analysis for a stochastic population viability analysis model of African wild dogs ( Lycaon pictus ) and compared these results with conventional sensitivity analyses of stochastic and deterministic models. Standardized coefficients from the logistic regression analyses indicated that pup survival explained the most variability in the probability of extinction, regardless of whether or not the model incorporated density dependence. Adult survival and the s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the analysis is important to identify why each control measure might be effective, and to help direct each control measure on the age class in which it will be most effective. According to Cross and Beissinger (2001) the best method for our type of The analysis suggests that survivorship during the adult stage (stages 2-17) is the most important factor contributing to population growth, being responsible for approximately 52% of k (Table 1). The results indicate why hunting is so effective at reducing k, while sterile males are not as effective on their own.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the analysis is important to identify why each control measure might be effective, and to help direct each control measure on the age class in which it will be most effective. According to Cross and Beissinger (2001) the best method for our type of The analysis suggests that survivorship during the adult stage (stages 2-17) is the most important factor contributing to population growth, being responsible for approximately 52% of k (Table 1). The results indicate why hunting is so effective at reducing k, while sterile males are not as effective on their own.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Shannon diversity number of 0 indicates that all the carrion occurs in one month of the year whereas a value of 1 indicates that the carrion is evenly distributed across each month of the year. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using Monte Carlo methods to assess the relative effects of several parameters on model statistics (Wisdom and Mills, 1997;Wisdom et al, 2000;Cross and Beissinger, a Because of the extreme sensitivity to this parameter, we confined it to this narrow range. In addition, for the reasons discussed in Getz (1996), this parameter is likely to be small (i.e.…”
Section: Simulations and Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean yearly carrion levels and Shannon diversity numbers for the years 101-500 were recorded for each run and used as the dependent variable in linear regressions in which the model parameters were the explanatory variables. Model parameters were ranked according to r 2 values in order to determine which ones explained the most variance in model output statistics (Wisdom and Mills, 1997;Wisdom et al, 2000;Cross and Beissinger, 2001). The larger the range in a parameter, the higher its r 2 may become.…”
Section: Simulations and Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, by varying input parameter values and/or model structure, the consequences of different parameter conditions on a model population's dynamics can be investigated (Cross and Beissinger, 2001). Sensitivity analysis can be used to determine which parameters most strongly in¯uence model predictions when uncertainty exists, and are helpful in focusing researchers' efforts on improving estimates of the most important variables (Reed et al, 1998;Caswell, 2001).…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the simulation procedure we use, the signi®cance of the parameters is a function of the somewhat arbitrary sample size (McCarthy et al, 1996). Therefore, the magnitude of the regression coef®cients was used to determine the importance (sensitivity) of each parameter to the value of the dependent variable, scaled by the level of uncertainty (see Cross and Beissinger, 2001). …”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%