2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using machine learning analysis to assist in differentiating between necrotizing enterocolitis and spontaneous intestinal perforation: A novel predictive analytic tool

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Supervised machine learning was used to evaluate NEC versus spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP), which can be differentiated at laparotomy, but the increasing use of peritoneal drains without direct visualization of the bowel limits the accuracy of the diagnosis. In a recent study that evaluated several clinical and radiographic features in infants who had undergone surgery where necrosis was clearly found versus isolated ileal perforation, machine learning was able to readily delineate several features that are helpful in differentiating these two outcomes prior to surgery 47 .…”
Section: Clinical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supervised machine learning was used to evaluate NEC versus spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP), which can be differentiated at laparotomy, but the increasing use of peritoneal drains without direct visualization of the bowel limits the accuracy of the diagnosis. In a recent study that evaluated several clinical and radiographic features in infants who had undergone surgery where necrosis was clearly found versus isolated ileal perforation, machine learning was able to readily delineate several features that are helpful in differentiating these two outcomes prior to surgery 47 .…”
Section: Clinical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, let n = 20 and filp = 5, where n denotes the number of features in Refsol. If the index of features are 0 to 19, feature subsets f 0 , f 1 , f 2 , f 3 and f 4 are obtained by flipping the following bits, as shown in Fig 4: (0,5,10,15), (1,6,11,16), (2,7,12,17), (3,8,13,18) and (4,9,14,19). In the second strategy, the k-th subset of features is obtained by flipping n/flip contiguous bits starting from the k-th bit.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second strategy, the k-th subset of features is obtained by flipping n/flip contiguous bits starting from the k-th bit. Following the previous example, the feature subsets f 0 , f 1 , f 2 , f 3 and f 4 are obtained by flipping the following bits: (0,1,2,3), (4,5,6,7), (8,9,10,11), (12,13,14,15) and (16,17,18,19). With the above two searching strategies, we determine the search area for each bee.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To date, only a few studies have used ML algorithms to predict IP in premature infants. Irles et al 31 reported an ML model predicting NEC-IP, and Lure et al 32 reported an ML model to differentiate NEC-IP and SIP prior to surgical interventions. Lin 33 et al reported an ML technique for individualized NEC risk scores using intestinal microbiota data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%