2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using machine learning to predict lifetime under isothermal low-cycle fatigue and thermo-mechanical fatigue loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Machine learning (ML) has powerful nonlinear processing and multivariate learning capabilities. It has been widely used for crack growth to solve complex nonlinear prediction problems [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Indeed, the radial basis function artificial neural network (RBF-ANN), backpropagation neural network (BPNN), extreme learning machine (ELM), fully connected neural network, random forest (RF), hidden Markov model (HMM), and long short-term memory (LSTM) all yield accurate life and crack growth predictions [26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning (ML) has powerful nonlinear processing and multivariate learning capabilities. It has been widely used for crack growth to solve complex nonlinear prediction problems [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Indeed, the radial basis function artificial neural network (RBF-ANN), backpropagation neural network (BPNN), extreme learning machine (ELM), fully connected neural network, random forest (RF), hidden Markov model (HMM), and long short-term memory (LSTM) all yield accurate life and crack growth predictions [26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sun et al [23] proposed an image recognition-based method with hysteresis loop images as input features of the convolution neural network (CNN) model, which demonstrates good prediction performance and flexibility in transferring applications. As for thermo-mechanical fatigue loading, the neural network with the gated recurrent unit (GRU) model [24] provided a good correlation between the experiment and the prediction. Besides, the machine learning models without neural network architecture can also provide good predicted results [25][26][27], such as support vector machine, random forest and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%