2021
DOI: 10.1002/mrd.23538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using machine learning to study protein–protein interactions: From the uromodulin polymer to egg zona pellucida filaments

Abstract: Neural network-based models for protein structure prediction have recently reached near-experimental accuracy and are fast becoming a powerful tool in the arsenal of biologists. As suggested by initial studies using RoseTTAFold or the ColabFold implementation of AlphaFold2, a particularly interesting future development will be the optimization of these computational methods to also routinely yield high-confidence predictions of protein-protein interactions. Here I use AlphaFold2 and ColabFold to investigate th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ZP module; (III-2) 1 copy of the hZP1 trefoil domain+ZP module, 1 copy of the hZP4 trefoil domain+ZP module; or (III-3) 1 copy of the hZP2 ZP module, 1 copy of the hZP4 trefoil domain+ZP module. Even when using 5 seeds per deep learning model, all predictions resulting from these combinations showed filamentous arrangements that were either circular (reminiscent of early prediction studies of UMOD 30 ) or straight (by disconnecting the ZP-N and ZP-C moieties of one subunit) (Figure S7A, step III).…”
Section: Experimental Model and Subject Detailsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ZP module; (III-2) 1 copy of the hZP1 trefoil domain+ZP module, 1 copy of the hZP4 trefoil domain+ZP module; or (III-3) 1 copy of the hZP2 ZP module, 1 copy of the hZP4 trefoil domain+ZP module. Even when using 5 seeds per deep learning model, all predictions resulting from these combinations showed filamentous arrangements that were either circular (reminiscent of early prediction studies of UMOD 30 ) or straight (by disconnecting the ZP-N and ZP-C moieties of one subunit) (Figure S7A, step III).…”
Section: Experimental Model and Subject Detailsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Using this material, we crystallized a ~74 kDa native heteromeric complex consisting of an intact ZP module from the fish homolog of ZP3 (fZP3) and single copies of the ZP-N and ZP-C domains of fish ZP1 (fZP1) -a trefoil domain-containing VE subunit whose ZP module closely resembles those of ZP1, ZP2 and ZP4 proteins from other vertebrates, and whose IDL is specifically cleaved during hatching. Although the ~4 Å resolution diffraction of the crystals hampered experimental phasing, we could solve the structure by MR using a partial AlphaFold model of the fZP3/fZP1 complex, generated using a procedure developed to investigate UMOD polymerization in silico 30 (crystal form I, Figure S6A, B and Table S3). The resulting refined model was then used for MR phasing of data collected from a different crystal form of the same material, which diffracted highly anisotropically beyond 2.7 Å resolution (crystal form II, Figure S6D-H and Table S3).…”
Section: Three-dimensional Architecture Of a Vertebrate Egg Coat Fila...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, Zhu et al [ 147 ] proposed PACNN + RL, a hybrid deep learning and reinforcement learning method for this task. On the other hand, Jovine [ 121 ] used AlphaFold2 and ColabFold to investigate the activation and polymerization of uromodulin, thus showcasing the practical applicability of these methods in biomedicine.…”
Section: Other Emerging Topics For Protein–protein Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 There have been significant advancements into the mechanisms of polymerization, the structure of these filaments and the role of the polymerized form in the urine. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] However, recent discoveries underscore the presence of a nonpolymerized form of uromodulin that is also released in the urine and is likely the main form released in the renal interstitium and circulation. 18 The cellular paths governing the release of these 2 forms are distinct from each other and appear to be independently regulated.…”
Section: Lafavers Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%