2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11205-014-0723-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Meta-goal Programming for a New Human Development Indicator with Distinguishable Country Ranks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We consider three outputs, the first of which is life expectancy at birth, a proxy for health provision. To proxy educational attainment, we follow Lozano and Gutiérrez (2008) and Sayed et al (2015) and use the indicators of mean and expected years of schooling as two separate outputs instead of taking their arithmetic average, to better reflect their different focus on the future expectations of education versus the current realizations of it. Such a choice is also grounded on recent statistical results by Canning et al (2013) who found that combining the two variables into a composite causes a substantial loss of information.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider three outputs, the first of which is life expectancy at birth, a proxy for health provision. To proxy educational attainment, we follow Lozano and Gutiérrez (2008) and Sayed et al (2015) and use the indicators of mean and expected years of schooling as two separate outputs instead of taking their arithmetic average, to better reflect their different focus on the future expectations of education versus the current realizations of it. Such a choice is also grounded on recent statistical results by Canning et al (2013) who found that combining the two variables into a composite causes a substantial loss of information.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As of weighting schemes, the existing literature offers a quite rich menu of alternative methods (Cherchye et al 2008;Guardiola and Picazo-Tadeo 2014;Melyn and Moesen 1991;OECD 2008a, b;Saaty 1987;Sayed et al 2015;Zhou et al 2010). In this work, we consider five weighting schemes.…”
Section: Case Study: Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also applied this model in evaluating performance of textile manufacturing company. Sayed et al (2015) presented a new methodology using Meta-Goal Programming Benefit of Doubt (MGP-BoD) to determine CI values. They used MGP-BoD to suggest a new Human Development Index (HDI).…”
Section: Social Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%