2003
DOI: 10.1002/nur.10093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using methodological triangulation for cultural verification of commitment to a plan for exercise scale among Korean adults with chronic diseases

Abstract: The purpose of this study was twofold: to use methodological triangulation to increase the cultural appropriateness of the Planning for Exercise Scale (Pender, 1996), which measures commitment to a plan of action, and to psychometrically evaluate the revised scale in a selected population of 230 Korean adults experiencing chronic diseases. First, through a qualitative approach, the cultural properties of the concept were identified in order to revise Pender's Planning for Exercise Scale. The revised scale cons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This represented all but two of the identified studies in the table. Of concern is the volume of similar United States (US) and Asian‐focused “health promotion” studies that centre on the singular task of measuring behavioural and lifestyle activities of clients, representing this contested location of health promotion (Stuifbergen & Rogers 1997; Newell‐Withrow 2000; Shin et al 2001, 2003, 2005; Kim et al 2003; Sohng et al 2002; Wu & Pender 2002; Oh & Seo 2003; Nuňez et al 2003; Wynd et al 2004; McCabe et al 2005; Johnson 2005; Sawatzky & Naimark 2005; Wilson 2005).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This represented all but two of the identified studies in the table. Of concern is the volume of similar United States (US) and Asian‐focused “health promotion” studies that centre on the singular task of measuring behavioural and lifestyle activities of clients, representing this contested location of health promotion (Stuifbergen & Rogers 1997; Newell‐Withrow 2000; Shin et al 2001, 2003, 2005; Kim et al 2003; Sohng et al 2002; Wu & Pender 2002; Oh & Seo 2003; Nuňez et al 2003; Wynd et al 2004; McCabe et al 2005; Johnson 2005; Sawatzky & Naimark 2005; Wilson 2005).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commitment to a plan for physical activity/exercise was measured by the Revised Planning for Exercise Scale (RPES), which was developed by Shin, Pender, and Yun (2003). The scale is based on the original Planning for Exercise Scale (Pender, 1996) and is intended to measure the commitment to a plan of action for Korean adults experiencing chronic diseases.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pender reported a 2-week test-retest reliability estimate of r ¼ .90. Although it has been used in adult populations (Shin, Pender, & Yun, 2003;Shin, Yun, Pender, & Jang, 2005) no reported use of this instrument in the college age population was found in the published literature. The construct, commitment to a plan of action, is unique to Pender's HPM, and the instrument was developed by the theorist, therefore further exploration of this instrument in various populations is warranted to support its use for selection in research with a college age population.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%