2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using mRNAsi to identify prognostic-related genes in endometrial carcinoma based on WGCNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the testing cohort, the results of Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed that high-risk patients were associated with poor prognosis ( P =6.727 e − 03; Figure 5(c) ), and the result of ROC curve showed that the AUC values of the risk signature for predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival were 0.629, 0.638, and 0.687 ( Figure 5(c) ), respectively. In the entire cohort, we validated the risk signature and compared it with another stemness-associated risk signature constructed by Liu et al [ 15 ]. Patients in the high-risk group divided by our risk signature had a worse prognosis than did those in the low-risk group ( P =3.719 e − 10; Figure 5(d) ), and this difference was more significant than that of Liu's risk signature ( P =2.025 e − 07).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the testing cohort, the results of Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed that high-risk patients were associated with poor prognosis ( P =6.727 e − 03; Figure 5(c) ), and the result of ROC curve showed that the AUC values of the risk signature for predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival were 0.629, 0.638, and 0.687 ( Figure 5(c) ), respectively. In the entire cohort, we validated the risk signature and compared it with another stemness-associated risk signature constructed by Liu et al [ 15 ]. Patients in the high-risk group divided by our risk signature had a worse prognosis than did those in the low-risk group ( P =3.719 e − 10; Figure 5(d) ), and this difference was more significant than that of Liu's risk signature ( P =2.025 e − 07).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both cohorts, the number of deaths in the high-risk group was greater than that in the Figure 5(c)), respectively. In the entire cohort, we validated the risk signature and compared it with another stemness-associated risk signature constructed by Liu et al [15]. Patients in the high-risk group divided by our risk signature had a worse prognosis than did those in the low-risk group (P � 3.719e − 10; Figure 5(d)), and this difference was more significant than that of Liu's risk signature (P � 2.025e − 07).…”
Section: Verification and Comparation Of The Risk Signaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2018, Malta et al (2018) proposed the conception of mRNAsi, which is considered as a more comprehensive index to uncover the characteristics of CSCs. Subsequently, mRNAsi was widely applied to reveal the stemness-related characteristics of different cancers, such as lung cancer (Qin et al, 2020;Zhang et al, 2020a), bladder cancer (Pan et al, 2019), endometrial carcinoma (Liu et al, 2020), medulloblastoma (Lian et al, 2019), and breast cancer (Pei et al, 2020). Moreover, mRNAsi was also used to identify the prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets associated with CSC characteristics of glioma (Lvu et al, 2020;Xia et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the mRNA expressionbased stemness index (mRNAsi), which represents the transcriptomic stemness expression, has been applied to assess CSC characteristics (Malta et al, 2018). In some cancers, such as bladder, lung, breast, or endometrial carcinoma, it has been reported that mRNAsi is a credible marker and is associated with tumor stage (Pan et al, 2019;Liu et al, 2020;Pei et al, 2020). However, its roles in glioma are rare known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.9. WGCNA analysis First, as precviously described, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between EC and normal specimens in the TCGA dataset were screened out using the "limma" package with threshold of adjusted P-value < 0.05 and |log2FC| >1 [21]. Next the expression pro le of these DEGs was sent to establish a gene coexpression network by the weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) package in R language as precviously described [22].…”
Section: Methylation and Mutantion Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%