2015
DOI: 10.1016/bs.plm.2014.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Multidimensional Encoding and Retrieval Contexts to Enhance Our Understanding of Stochastic Dependence in Source Memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
15
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
2
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with much of the prior work on multidimensional source memory (Hicks & Starns, 2015), location decision performance was correlated with Note. BR^|R is the proportion of Bright^decisions given items studied on the right; BR^|L is the proportion of Bright^decisions given items studied on the left.…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consistent with much of the prior work on multidimensional source memory (Hicks & Starns, 2015), location decision performance was correlated with Note. BR^|R is the proportion of Bright^decisions given items studied on the right; BR^|L is the proportion of Bright^decisions given items studied on the left.…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
“…As we have argued elsewhere (Hicks & Starns, 2015;Starns & Hicks, 2005), these patterns of stochastic dependence in Experiments 1A and 2 reflect the likelihood that on some encoding trials, the face and location information were bound successfully with the stimulus word without necessarily being bound to one another. The fact that such dependence essentially doubled from Experiment 1A (about a 7 % difference between gender-correct vs. gender-incorrect) to Experiment 2 (about a 14 % difference) reinforces the notion that encoding factors are primarily responsible for these differences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evidence from the long-term source-memory literature also suggests that there is a degree of asymmetry in relation to how source details are bound to items, with information about color and 14 location being directly, but independently, bound to item information, but not each other (Starns & Hicks, 2005; see Hicks & Starns, 2015 for a review). This lack of coherency and symmetry in item-based representations might underlie the decreases in dependency seen over time in Brady et al (2013).…”
Section: Forgetting Of Coherent Event Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stochastic dependence in context retrieval is present when retrieval of one context feature (e.g., spatial position) is more likely if the other context feature (e.g., gender) is successfully retrieved (e.g., Meiser & Bröder, 2002). Stochastic dependence has been shown across several experiments and manipulations (for an overview see, e.g., Hicks & Starns, 2015), but there are different alternative explanations of this phenomenon.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%