2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using multimodal remote sensing data to estimate regional-scale soil moisture content: A case study of Beijing, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bertalan et al [96] compared the abilities of RF, Elastic Net Regression (ENR), the Generalized Linear Model (GLM), and the Robust Linear Model (RLM) for estimating RZSM, and found that RF had the highest accuracy, followed by ENR, while the GLM had the lowest accuracy. Based on optical and thermal infrared remote sensing data provided by Landsat-8, Cheng et al [97] employed RF to estimate the multi-layer soil moisture in Beijing, China, and the results showed that RF achieved higher accuracy, with R 2 ranging from 0.67 to 0.81, and relative root-mean-square error (rRMSE) ranging from 8.74% to 14.68%. Zhu et al [98] found that the ANN outperformed RF and linear models in RZSM estimation, and they constructed a simple model with only five input variables, which achieved high accuracy (RMSE was 0.039 cm 3 /cm 3 , and R 2 was 0.697).…”
Section: Machine Learning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bertalan et al [96] compared the abilities of RF, Elastic Net Regression (ENR), the Generalized Linear Model (GLM), and the Robust Linear Model (RLM) for estimating RZSM, and found that RF had the highest accuracy, followed by ENR, while the GLM had the lowest accuracy. Based on optical and thermal infrared remote sensing data provided by Landsat-8, Cheng et al [97] employed RF to estimate the multi-layer soil moisture in Beijing, China, and the results showed that RF achieved higher accuracy, with R 2 ranging from 0.67 to 0.81, and relative root-mean-square error (rRMSE) ranging from 8.74% to 14.68%. Zhu et al [98] found that the ANN outperformed RF and linear models in RZSM estimation, and they constructed a simple model with only five input variables, which achieved high accuracy (RMSE was 0.039 cm 3 /cm 3 , and R 2 was 0.697).…”
Section: Machine Learning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Y E is the estimated rice yield and Y R is the recorded rice yield; n is 800, i.e., the count of samples. The three metrics R 2 , RMSE, and rRMSE have been widely employed to assess model performance [11][12][13]24]. R 2 varies from −1 to 1; a value closer to 1 indicates that the estimated rice yield is more consistent with the recorded rice yield.…”
Section: Validation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since establishing dense sensor networks could prove costly, labor‐intensive, and destructive to soil profiles (Lekshmi et al., 2014), SM estimation using remote sensing (RS) provides a practical solution to these challenges. RS has emerged as a powerful tool to provide spatially and temporally representative SM data, thus increasing the measurement possibilities, especially for remote catchments with sparse monitoring networks (Cheng et al., 2022; Hillel, 2003; Kundu et al., 2017; Peng et al., 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%