2018
DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2018.1425514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Multiple Methods to Understand the Nature of Relationships in Social Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Where necessary, statistical tests can be performed to identify significant differences between elicited mental models, including between groups of people (e.g., scientists and policy makers) (e.g., Moon et al., ). To increase the likelihood that participants are interpreting variables in a similar way, definitions of variables can be developed and provided to participants (e.g., Adams et al., ). Participants are typically invited to include any additional variables they consider essential to their model.…”
Section: Eliciting or Developing Concepts And Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where necessary, statistical tests can be performed to identify significant differences between elicited mental models, including between groups of people (e.g., scientists and policy makers) (e.g., Moon et al., ). To increase the likelihood that participants are interpreting variables in a similar way, definitions of variables can be developed and provided to participants (e.g., Adams et al., ). Participants are typically invited to include any additional variables they consider essential to their model.…”
Section: Eliciting or Developing Concepts And Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a stakeholder may be central due to a high number of social ties; however, centrality does not necessarily mean that the stakeholder is 'highly trusted', or is considered effective in achieving specific conservation outcomes. Mixed-methods can identify stakeholders with influence characteristics who would be neglected in engagement activities if these were based only on network centrality scores (Adams et al 2018). Mixed-methods may provide a holistic approach to social networks by identifying who holds influential positions and which stakeholders (whether they are identifiable leaders or not) have a prominent role in supporting actions and decisions for conservation outcomes.…”
Section: Key Finding: Mixed-methods Inform Marine Conservation Engagement Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uncovering the qualities of influential individuals in a social network (i.e. whether it is the individual or their role that influences marine conservation) can be important for achieving conservation outcomes (Onwuegbuzie et al 2009;Adams et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A investigação do papel das redes sociais para a sustentabilidade vem crescendo. Estudos aplicam a perspectiva de redes para a gestão de recursos naturais (BODIN; CRONA; ERNSTSON, 2006;BARNES et al, 2016;BARNES et al, 2017;ADAMS et al, 2018) e para a compreensão dos sistemas sócio-ecológicos (BODIN;CRONA, 2009;BARNES et al, 2015;BODIN, 2017).…”
Section: Teoria De Redes Sociais E a Relevância Para O Estudo Da Agri...unclassified